These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20797698)

  • 1. Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli.
    Notebaert L; Crombez G; Van Damme S; De Houwer J; Theeuwes J
    Behav Res Ther; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1150-4. PubMed ID: 20797698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of extinction and reinstatement in attentional bias to threat: a conditioning approach.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Hermans D; Koster EH; Eccleston C
    Behav Res Ther; 2006 Nov; 44(11):1555-63. PubMed ID: 16375852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing efficiency in anxiety: Evidence from eye-movements during visual search.
    Derakshan N; Koster EH
    Behav Res Ther; 2010 Dec; 48(12):1180-5. PubMed ID: 20851380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional prioritisation of threatening information: examining the role of the size of the attentional window.
    Notebaert L; Crombez G; Van Damme S; Durnez W; Theeuwes J
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 23061792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditioning-induced attentional bias for face stimuli measured with the emotional Stroop task.
    Lee TH; Lim SL; Lee K; Kim HT; Choi JS
    Emotion; 2009 Feb; 9(1):134-9. PubMed ID: 19186927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Notebaert L
    Emotion; 2008 Dec; 8(6):820-7. PubMed ID: 19102593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fear-conditioned cues of impending pain facilitate attentional engagement.
    Van Damme S; Lorenz J; Eccleston C; Koster EH; De Clercq A; Crombez G
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2004 Feb; 34(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15030798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impaired disengagement from threatening cues of impending pain in a crossmodal cueing paradigm.
    Van Damme S; Crombez G; Eccleston C; Goubert L
    Eur J Pain; 2004 Jun; 8(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 15109973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional bias in high- and low-anxious individuals: evidence for threat-induced effects on engagement and disengagement.
    Massar SA; Mol NM; Kenemans JL; Baas JM
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Aug; 25(5):805-17. PubMed ID: 21824022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. There's that scary picture: attention bias to threatening scenes in Williams syndrome.
    Dodd HF; Porter MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 21110991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is there a mutual relationship between opposite attentional biases underlying anxiety?
    Onnis R; Dadds MR; Bryant RA
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):582-94. PubMed ID: 21668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure to condition to a cue is associated with sustained contextual fear.
    Baas JM; van Ooijen L; Goudriaan A; Kenemans JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Mar; 127(3):581-92. PubMed ID: 18048004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of an attentional bias for angry faces following Pavlovian fear conditioning.
    Pischek-Simpson LK; Boschen MJ; Neumann DL; Waters AM
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Apr; 47(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 19232574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interacting effects of worry and anxiety on attentional disengagement from threat.
    Verkuil B; Brosschot JF; Putman P; Thayer JF
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Feb; 47(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 19100965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Observational fear conditioning in the acquisition and extinction of attentional bias for threat: an experimental evaluation.
    Kelly MM; Forsyth JP
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):324-35. PubMed ID: 17516811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signals of threat do not capture, but prioritize, attention: a conditioning approach.
    Notebaert L; Crombez G; Van Damme S; De Houwer J; Theeuwes J
    Emotion; 2011 Feb; 11(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 21401228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective attention and avoidance on a pictorial cueing task during stress in clinically anxious and depressed participants.
    Ellenbogen MA; Schwartzman AE
    Behav Res Ther; 2009 Feb; 47(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 19054500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.