These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2079773)

  • 1. A comparison of cupola-free perimetry with conventional perimetry: preliminary results.
    Jenni A; Hirsbrunner HP
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1990; 34(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 2079773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.
    Brenton RS; Argus WA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 May; 28(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 3570687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y; Barrault O; Lefrançois A; Demailly P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
    Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of glaucomatous visual field defects with automated perimetry.
    Flammer J; Drance SM; Augustiny L; Funkhouser A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1985 Feb; 26(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 3972500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Statistical analysis of visual fields by the automatic perimeter Octopus 2000 R with the Delta program].
    Pradines F; Delbosc B; Royer J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985; 8(8-9):541-8. PubMed ID: 3841358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Detectability of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Octopus automatic perimeter. A comparison between program G-1 and programs 31 and 32 and their combinations].
    Gloor B; Gloor E
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1986 Jan; 188(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 3754292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-pass resolution perimetry and light-sense perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 7492934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal summation measurements with the Octopus 1-2-3 perimeter.
    Funkhouser AT; Fankhauser F
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1994 Mar; 3(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 8193572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
    Li JJ; Xu L; Zhang RX; Sun XY; Yang H; Zou Y; Zhao JL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
    Zulauf M; Caprioli J
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of eight test location configurations for estimating G1 mean defect values.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1989; 33(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 2677458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Study of early glaucomatous visual field defects with the automatic perimeter Topcon SBP-1000. Comparative study with the Octopus 201 perimeter].
    Lachenmayr B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1987 Jul; 191(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 3657015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect.
    Kondo Y; Yamamoto T; Sato Y; Matsubara M; Kitazawa Y
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Aug; 7(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 9713784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of three methods for abbreviating G1 examinations.
    Funkhouser A; Fankhauser F; Hirsbrunner H
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1989; 33(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 2677457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.