257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20799249)
1. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.
Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM; Irwig L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 18778913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating disease prevalence in a Bayesian framework using probabilistic constraints.
Berkvens D; Speybroeck N; Praet N; Adel A; Lesaffre E
Epidemiology; 2006 Mar; 17(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16477254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pepe MS; Janes H
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous alleviation of verification and reference standard biases in a community-based tuberculosis screening study using Bayesian latent class analysis.
Keter AK; Vanobberghen F; Lynen L; Van Heerden A; Fehr J; Olivier S; Wong EB; Glass TR; Reither K; Goetghebeur E; Jacobs BKM
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0305126. PubMed ID: 38857227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research.
Ewald B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):798-801. PubMed ID: 16828672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
