These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20800270)

  • 1. Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Krämer N; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2010 Nov; 26(11):1113-8. PubMed ID: 20800270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years.
    Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations to dentin in vivo and in vitro.
    Hahn P; Weyen G; Fischer P; Plogmann S; Hannig M
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 19146127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin and enamel bond strengths of dual-cure composite luting agents used with dual-cure dental adhesives.
    Ritter AV; Ghaname E; Pimenta LA
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18926614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Apr; 13(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 11764834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanohybrid vs. fine hybrid composite in extended Class II cavities after six years.
    Krämer N; García-Godoy F; Reinelt C; Feilzer AJ; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2011 May; 27(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 21397316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of hybridization on marginal leakage and bond strength.
    Ferrari M; Mason PN; Vichi A; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 11764128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between microtensile bond strength data and clinical outcome of Class V restorations.
    Heintze SD; Thunpithayakul C; Armstrong SR; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2011 Feb; 27(2):114-25. PubMed ID: 20947156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.
    Bortolotto T; Doudou W; Kunzelmann KH; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 22015462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary: effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in Class V resin composite restorations.
    Brucia J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 20002928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential of restorative systems with simplified adhesives: quantitative analysis of wear and marginal adaptation in vitro.
    Göhring TN; Schönenberger KA; Lutz F
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 14579884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC; Oshima HM; Costa Filho LC
    Gen Dent; 2008; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of inlay-retained adhesive fixed partial dentures after mechanical and thermal stress: an in vitro study.
    Göehring TN; Peters OA; Lutz F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 11458266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.