These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20800443)

  • 1. Bayesian statistical method was underused despite its advantages in the assessment of implantable medical devices.
    Pibouleau L; Chevret S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Mar; 64(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 20800443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies.
    Sedrakyan A; Marinac-Dabic D; Normand SL; Mushlin A; Gross T
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S121-8. PubMed ID: 20421824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using covariates to reduce uncertainty in the economic evaluation of clinical trial data.
    Vázquez-Polo FJ; Negrín Hernández MA; López-Valcárcel BG
    Health Econ; 2005 Jun; 14(6):545-57. PubMed ID: 15497202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis model for medical device evaluation: application to intracranial stents.
    Pibouleau L; Chevret S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 23601495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness from censored data.
    Heitjan DF; Kim CY; Li H
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1297-309. PubMed ID: 15083484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales.
    Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness: an importance-sampling approach.
    Heitjan DF; Li H
    Health Econ; 2004 Feb; 13(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 14737756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building a Bayesian bridge from evidence to guidelines.
    Goodman SN
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 169(15):1436-7. PubMed ID: 19667309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian classification of clinical practice guidelines.
    Diamond GA; Kaul S
    Arch Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 169(15):1431-5. PubMed ID: 19667308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian perspectives for epidemiologic research: III. Bias analysis via missing-data methods.
    Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 38(6):1662-73. PubMed ID: 19744933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trials and haemophilia: does the Bayesian approach make the ideal and desirable good friends?
    Iorio A; Marcucci M
    Haemophilia; 2009 Jul; 15(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 19473413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data.
    O'Hagan A; Stevens JW; Montmartin J
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(5):733-53. PubMed ID: 11241573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Updating meta-analytic research findings: Bayesian approaches versus the medical model.
    Schmidt FL; Raju NS
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Mar; 92(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 17371079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An illustration of the modelling of cost and efficacy data from a clinical trial.
    Hahn S; Whitehead A
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):1009-24. PubMed ID: 12627415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classic or Bayesian research design and analysis. Does it make a difference?
    Bloom BS; de Pouvourville N; Libert S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 11987435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian approach to meta-analysis of plant pathology studies.
    Mila AL; Ngugi HK
    Phytopathology; 2011 Jan; 101(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 20822433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials.
    DerSimonian R
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1237-48; discussion 1249-52. PubMed ID: 8817798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian clinical trials.
    Berry DA
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2006 Jan; 5(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16485344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.