151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20801255)
1. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation into the magnitude of the current window and perception of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) sensation at various frequencies and body sites in healthy human participants.
Hughes N; Bennett MI; Johnson MI
Clin J Pain; 2013 Feb; 29(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 23183261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Effects of pulse height and pulse width on the magnitude sensation of electrocutaneous stimulus (author's transl)].
Tachi S; Tanie K; Abe M
Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1977 Sep; 15(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 592546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of varying frequency, intensity, and pulse duration of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on primary hyperalgesia in inflamed rats.
Gopalkrishnan P; Sluka KA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Jul; 81(7):984-90. PubMed ID: 10896017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternating frequencies of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: does it produce greater analgesic effects on mechanical and thermal pain thresholds?
Tong KC; Lo SK; Cheing GL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1344-9. PubMed ID: 17908580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensory perception and neuroanatomical structures in normal and grafted skin of burn survivors.
Nedelec B; Hou Q; Sohbi I; Choinière M; Beauregard G; Dykes RW
Burns; 2005 Nov; 31(7):817-30. PubMed ID: 16199293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
Lindenblatt G; Silny J
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stellate ganglion block with transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS): a double-blind study with healthy probands].
Larsen B; Macher F; Bolte M; Larsen R
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1995 May; 30(3):155-62. PubMed ID: 7605835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of evoked tactile sensation in forearm amputees with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Chai G; Sui X; Li S; He L; Lan N
J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066002. PubMed ID: 26401550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partial masking in electrocutaneous sensation: a model for sensation matching, with applications to loudness recruitment.
Larkin WD; Penner MJ
Percept Psychophys; 1989 Sep; 46(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 2771612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation.
Ward AR; Lucas-Toumbourou S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Aug; 88(8):1036-41. PubMed ID: 17678667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
Szeto AY
Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-frequency rectangular pulse is superior to middle frequency alternating current stimulation in cycling of people with spinal cord injury.
Szecsi J; Fornusek C; Krause P; Straube A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 88(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 17321827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation.
Szeto AY
Ann Biomed Eng; 1985; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 4073624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intestinal sensitivity testing by transmucosal electrical nerve stimulation: stimulus parameters to induce conscious perception.
Accarino AM; Azpiroz A; Malagelada JR
Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2006 Jun; 18(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 16700723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity Discriminability of Electrocutaneous and Intraneural Stimulation Pulse Frequency in Intact Individuals and Amputees.
George JA; Brinton MR; Colgan PC; Colvin GK; Bensmaia SJ; Clark GA
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3893-3896. PubMed ID: 33018851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
