204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20801854)
1. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Tu S; Holm NR; Koning G; Maeng M; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 78(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 21766427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
Boogers MJ; Schuijf JD; Kitslaar PH; van Werkhoven JM; de Graaf FR; Boersma E; van Velzen JE; Dijkstra J; Adame IM; Kroft LJ; de Roos A; Schreur JH; Heijenbrok MW; Jukema JW; Reiber JH; Bax JJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.
Dewey M; Rutsch W; Schnapauff D; Teige F; Hamm B
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 17220725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.
Cury RC; Ferencik M; Achenbach S; Pomerantsev E; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients.
Kefer J; Coche E; Legros G; Pasquet A; Grandin C; Van Beers BE; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15992641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography.
Cury RC; Pomerantsev EV; Ferencik M; Hoffmann U; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Achenbach S
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Sep; 96(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 16169361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
Malagò R; D'Onofrio M; Tavella D; Mantovani W; Brunelli S; Pezzato A; Caliari G; Nicolì L; Benussi P; Mucelli RP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of vessel attenuation on quantitative coronary angiography with 64-slice CT.
Husmann L; Gaemperli O; Valenta I; Schepis T; Scheffel H; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Desbiolles L; Marincek B; Alkadhi H; Kaufmann PA
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(980):649-53. PubMed ID: 19221184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of coronary arterial stenoses by multidetector CT angiography in comparison with conventional angiography methods, caveats, and implications.
Arbab-Zadeh A; Hoe J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Feb; 4(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 21329905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of coronary atheroma by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound and angiography.
Ugolini P; Pressacco J; Lespérance J; Berry C; L'Allier PL; Ibrahim R; Grégoire J; Ouellet R; Heinonen T; Levesque S; Guertin MC; Tardif JC
Can J Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 25(11):641-7. PubMed ID: 19898696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard.
Joshi SB; Okabe T; Roswell RO; Weissman G; Lopez CF; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Weissman NJ; Waksman R; Weigold WG
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19801022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between different kernel reformatting filters in 3D quantitative analysis of MDCT coronary angiography.
Malagò R; Pezzato A; Barbiani C; Mantovani W; Caliari G; Alfonsi U; Tavella D; Mucelli RP
Radiol Med; 2011 Dec; 116(8):1203-16. PubMed ID: 21892715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive versus noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Schuijf JD; van Werkhoven JM; Pundziute G; Jukema JW; Decramer I; Stokkel MP; Dibbets-Schneider P; Schalij MJ; Reiber JH; van der Wall EE; Wijns W; Bax JJ
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Mar; 1(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 19356428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of nonculprit coronary lesions: comparison of cardiac 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography.
Dodd JD; Rieber J; Pomerantsev E; Chaithiraphan V; Achenbach S; Moreiras JM; Abbara S; Hoffmann U; Brady TJ; Cury RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):432-8. PubMed ID: 18647913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.
Meijboom WB; Van Mieghem CA; van Pelt N; Weustink A; Pugliese F; Mollet NR; Boersma E; Regar E; van Geuns RJ; de Jaegere PJ; Serruys PW; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 52(8):636-43. PubMed ID: 18702967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized evaluation framework for evaluating coronary artery stenosis detection, stenosis quantification and lumen segmentation algorithms in computed tomography angiography.
Kirişli HA; Schaap M; Metz CT; Dharampal AS; Meijboom WB; Papadopoulou SL; Dedic A; Nieman K; de Graaf MA; Meijs MF; Cramer MJ; Broersen A; Cetin S; Eslami A; Flórez-Valencia L; Lor KL; Matuszewski B; Melki I; Mohr B; Oksüz I; Shahzad R; Wang C; Kitslaar PH; Unal G; Katouzian A; Örkisz M; Chen CM; Precioso F; Najman L; Masood S; Ünay D; van Vliet L; Moreno R; Goldenberg R; Vuçini E; Krestin GP; Niessen WJ; van Walsum T
Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):859-76. PubMed ID: 23837963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automatic segmentation, detection and quantification of coronary artery stenoses on CTA.
Shahzad R; Kirişli H; Metz C; Tang H; Schaap M; van Vliet L; Niessen W; van Walsum T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 29(8):1847-59. PubMed ID: 23925713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.
Molloi S; Johnson T; Ding H; Lipinski J
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 27838897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography compared with coronary angiography].
Valgeirsdóttir IR; Haraldsdóttir S; Scheving SS; Gudjónsdóttir J; Sigurdsson AF; Gudnason T; Eyjólfsson K; Jónsdóttir B; Andersen K
Laeknabladid; 2008 Mar; 94(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18310782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
