These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20802584)
1. Modulation transfer function measurement technique for small-pixel detectors. Marchywka M; Socker DG Appl Opt; 1992 Dec; 31(34):7198-213. PubMed ID: 20802584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sinusoidal modulation analysis for optical system MTF measurements. Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert JA Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1955-63. PubMed ID: 8994160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography. Elbakri IA; McIntosh BJ; Rickey DW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Mar; 54(6):1743-55. PubMed ID: 19242050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of scintillator on the modulation transfer function (MTF) of a digital imaging system. Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 May; 99(5):608-13. PubMed ID: 15829886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the validity of modulation transfer function evaluation techniques with application to small area and scanned digital detectors. Price BD; Esbrand CJ; Olivo A; Gibson AP; Hebden JC; Speller RD; Royle GJ Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Nov; 79(11):113103. PubMed ID: 19045885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Partially light-controlled imager based on liquid crystal plate and image intensifier for aurora and airglow measurement. Tang Y; Cao X; Liu H; Shepherd GG; Liu S; Gao H; Yang X; Wu Y; Wang S Appl Opt; 2012 Apr; 51(12):1968-75. PubMed ID: 22534903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of the modulation transfer function of digital X-ray detectors with an opaque edge-test device. Illers H; Buhr E; Günther-Kohfahl S; Neitzel U Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15933111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modulation-transfer function measurement of SPRITE detectors: sine-wave response. Barnard KJ; Boreman GD; Plogstedt AE; Anderson BK Appl Opt; 1992 Jan; 31(1):144-7. PubMed ID: 20717385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation transfer function measurement of sparse-array sensors using a self-calibrating fringe pattern. Greivenkamp JE; Lowman AE Appl Opt; 1994 Aug; 33(22):5029-36. PubMed ID: 20935883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modulation transfer function of a triangular pixel array detector. Karimzadeh A J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jul; 31(7):1688-91. PubMed ID: 25121458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of spectrum distortion on modulation transfer function in imaging fiber-optic spectrometer]. Cheng X; Wang J; Zhang B; Hong YF Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2011 Oct; 31(10):2861-4. PubMed ID: 22250572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transfer function for image formation of objects reconstructed from volume holograms with different wavelengths. Külich HC Appl Opt; 1992 May; 31(14):2461-77. PubMed ID: 20725172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of approaches and artefacts in the measurement of detector modulation transfer functions. Boothroyd CB; Kasama T; Dunin-Borkowski RE Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Jun; 129():18-29. PubMed ID: 23548973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modulation Transfer Function Measurement Using Three- and Four-bar Targets. Boreman GD; Yang S Appl Opt; 1995 Dec; 34(34):8050-2. PubMed ID: 21068904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Investigations on the conditions of scanning on cell images by means of a microscope-TV-system (author's transl)]. Harms H; Boseck S; Aus HM; Lenz V Microsc Acta; 1981 Sep; 85(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 7029218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Method for the measurement of the modulation transfer function of sampled imaging systems from bar-target patterns. Sitter DN; Goddard JS; Ferrell RK Appl Opt; 1995 Feb; 34(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 20963180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement of the spatial response of a detector pixel. Zabar Y; Ribak EN; Lipson SG Micron; 2007; 38(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 17084636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Requirements for relative intensity correction of Raman spectra obtained by column-summing charge-coupled device data. Hurst WS; Choquette SJ; Etz ES Appl Spectrosc; 2007 Jul; 61(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 17697462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the ball, wire, edge, and bar/space pattern techniques for modulation transfer function measurements of linear x-ray detectors. Kaftandjian V; Zhu YM; Roziere G; Peix G; Babot D J Xray Sci Technol; 1996 Jan; 6(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 21307523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system. Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]