164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20803475)
1. Effects of total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral stem surface finish, collar and cement thickness on load transfer to the femur.
Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Morrison BJ; Dorr LD
J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2003; 1(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 20803475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial stability of cemented femoral stems as a function of surface finish, collar, and stem size.
Ebramzadeh E; Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Buhari CF; Dorr LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):106-15. PubMed ID: 14711952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of surface finish and of vertical ribs on the stability of a cemented femoral stem: an in vitro stair climbing test.
Jamali AA; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Jan; 21(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 16446196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vitro characteristics of cemented titanium femoral stems with a smooth surface finish.
Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Kaneuji A; Matsumoto T; Nakamura T
J Orthop Sci; 2013 Jan; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 22945910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges in relating experimental hip implant fixation predictions to clinical observations.
Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 21040920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems.
Huiskes R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Dec; (261):27-38. PubMed ID: 2245558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
Ramos A; Simões JA
J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.
Behairy YM; Harris WH
Saudi Med J; 2002 Oct; 23(10):1187-94. PubMed ID: 12436120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur.
Hua J; Walker PS
J Orthop Res; 1995 May; 13(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 7602395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of cortical strain after cemented and press-fit proximal and distal femoral replacement.
Hua J; Walker PS
J Orthop Res; 1992 Sep; 10(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 1500986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surface roughness of debonded straight-tapered stems in cemented THA reduces subsidence but not cement damage.
Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
Biomaterials; 1998 Oct; 19(19):1773-9. PubMed ID: 9856588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
