These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20804289)
1. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Butler AC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Halamish V; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Karpicke JD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Karpicke JD; Butler AC; Roediger HL Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 19358016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge. Tiede HL; Leboe JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs. de Jonge M; Tabbers HK Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contributions of encoding, retention, and recall to the Hebb effect. Oberauer K; Meyer N Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):774-81. PubMed ID: 19598058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Karpicke JD; Roediger HL Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):966-8. PubMed ID: 18276894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test. Agarwal PK; Roediger HL Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):836-52. PubMed ID: 21995673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect. Smith TA; Kimball DR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Roediger HL; Butler AC Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Jan; 15(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 20951630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]