250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20804296)
1. Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.
Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1267-89. PubMed ID: 20804296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. There is no clam with coats in the calm coast: delimiting the transposed-letter priming effect.
Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1930-47. PubMed ID: 19358058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Associative priming effects with visible, transposed-letter nonwords: JUGDE facilitates COURT.
Perea M; Palti D; Gomez P
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Apr; 74(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 22274995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a prelexical phonological level?
Perea M; Carreiras M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1600-13. PubMed ID: 16873111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique.
Perea M; Acha J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Feb; 130(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 19081083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverses as a function of study task and speed stress.
Zeelenberg R; Wagenmakers EJ; Shiffrin RM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):270-7. PubMed ID: 14736311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tan SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 22612169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lexical and sublexical processes in the perception of transposed-letter anagrams.
Frankish C; Barnes L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 17935005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming.
Binder JR; Medler DA; Desai R; Conant LL; Liebenthal E
Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):677-93. PubMed ID: 15921937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ERP study of category priming: evidence of early lexical semantic access.
Segalowitz SJ; Zheng X
Biol Psychol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 18524454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
Wile TL; Borowsky R
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transposed-letter and laterality effects in lexical decision.
Perea M; Fraga I
Brain Lang; 2006 Apr; 97(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16183108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: automatic semantic access may not be a myth.
Tse CS; Neely JH
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1143-61. PubMed ID: 17983319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Category size effects revisited: frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization.
Forster KI
Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):276-86. PubMed ID: 15172545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers.
Acha J; Perea M
Br J Psychol; 2008 May; 99(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 17631694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral and neurobiological effects of printed word repetition in lexical decision and naming.
Katz L; Lee CH; Tabor W; Frost SJ; Mencl WE; Sandak R; Rueckl J; Pugh KR
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2068-83. PubMed ID: 16243052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition.
Duñabeitia JA; Perea M; Carreiras M
Cognition; 2007 Dec; 105(3):691-703. PubMed ID: 17217942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming.
Perea M; Lupker SJ
Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):829-41. PubMed ID: 14651292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
