These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20805709)

  • 61. Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Vitek 2 Meropenem-Vaborbactam for Susceptibility Testing of
    Dwivedi HP; Franklin S; Chandrasekaran S; Garner O; Traczewski MM; Beasley D; Procop GW; Tuohy M; Wilson D; Bala Y; Pincus DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2022 Jan; 60(1):e0161021. PubMed ID: 34705536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Ultrafast Parallelized Microfluidic Platform for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram Positive and Negative Bacteria.
    Kang W; Sarkar S; Lin ZS; McKenney S; Konry T
    Anal Chem; 2019 May; 91(9):6242-6249. PubMed ID: 30938989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A multi-site, international laboratory study to assess the performance of penicillin susceptibility testing of Staphylococcus aureus.
    Henderson A; Cheng MP; Chew KL; Coombs GW; Davis JS; Grant JM; Gregson D; Giulieri SG; Howden BP; Lee TC; Nguyen V; Mora JM; Morpeth SC; Robinson JO; Tong SYC; Van Hal SJ;
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2023 Jun; 78(6):1499-1504. PubMed ID: 37071589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Reporting antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance phenotypes in Staphylococcus spp.: a nationwide proficiency study.
    Fernández-Cuenca F; López-Hernández I; Cercenado E; Conejo C; Tormo N; Gimeno C; Pascual A
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2021 Apr; 76(5):1187-1196. PubMed ID: 33555012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Evaluation of the Clinical Systems for Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Gram-Negative Bacteria in China.
    Zhu Y; Jia P; Zhou M; Zhang J; Zhang G; Kang W; Duan S; Wang T; Xu Y; Yang Q
    Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():610604. PubMed ID: 33692761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. QMAC-dRAST for the direct testing of antibiotic susceptibility for Enterobacterales in positive blood-culture broth: a comparison of the performances with the MicroScan system and direct disc diffusion testing methods.
    Gallois E; Fihman V; Danjean M; Gomart C; Kimseng H; Le Guen R; Royer G; Woerther PL
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2023 Mar; 78(3):684-691. PubMed ID: 36611274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Performance evaluation of the Becton Dickinson Kiestra™ IdentifA/SusceptA.
    Jacot D; Sarton-Lohéac G; Coste AT; Bertelli C; Greub G; Prod'hom G; Croxatto A
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Aug; 27(8):1167.e9-1167.e17. PubMed ID: 33031951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Testing against
    Manuel C; Maynard R; Abbott A; Adams K; Alby K; Sweeney A; Dien Bard J; Flores II; Rekasius V; Harrington A; Kidd TS; Mathers AJ; Tekle T; Simner PJ; Humphries RM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):e0161722. PubMed ID: 36719243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Evaluation of FASTinov Ultrarapid Flow Cytometry Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Directly from Positive Blood Cultures.
    Silva-Dias A; Pérez-Viso B; Martins-Oliveira I; Gomes R; Rodrigues AG; Cantón R; Pina-Vaz C
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Sep; 59(10):e0054421. PubMed ID: 34346718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of MICs in
    Suwono B; Hammerl JA; Eckmanns T; Merle R; Eigner U; Lümen M; Lauter S; Stock R; Fenner I; Boemke E; Tenhagen BA
    JAC Antimicrob Resist; 2021 Sep; 3(3):dlab145. PubMed ID: 34676365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Forward Laser Light Scatter Technology.
    Hayden RT; Clinton LK; Hewitt C; Koyamatsu T; Sun Y; Jamison G; Perkins R; Tang L; Pounds S; Bankowski MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 54(11):2701-2706. PubMed ID: 27558176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of MicroScan Rapid Pos Combo panels for identification of staphylococci.
    Stoakes L; Schieven BC; Ofori E; Ewan P; Lannigan R; Hussain Z
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 1734071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Evaluation of the Liquid Colony™ Produced by the FAST System for Shortening the Time of Bacterial Identification and Phenotypic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Detection of Resistance Mechanisms from Positive Blood Cultures.
    Bonaiuto C; Baccani I; Chilleri C; Antonelli A; Giani T; Rossolini GM
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 May; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37296699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Antibiotic-affinity chromatographic test strip for quantitative analysis and antibiotic resistance testing of Staphylococcus aureus.
    Shi Y; Yang H; He Y; Fu Z
    Talanta; 2019 Dec; 205():120130. PubMed ID: 31450481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Evaluation of BD Phoenix and Microscan WalkAway for determination of fosfomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus.
    Bondi A; Peradotto M; Bianco G; Ghibaudo D; Barbui AM; Costa C; Cavallo R
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 99(4):115240. PubMed ID: 33465684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Rapid pathogen identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility directly from urine specimens.
    Burg L; Crewe G; DiMeo J; Guo X; Li CG; Mayol M; Tempesta A; Lauzier W; Markham R; Crissy K; Barry C; Walsh B; Kirby JE; Straus D
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18315. PubMed ID: 36380053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing determined by Alfred 60/AST (Alifax®) in a multi-sites lab: performance's evaluation and optimization of workflow.
    Cupaiolo R; Cherkaoui S; Serrano G; Dauby N; Georgala A; Blumental S; Maillart E; Hites M; Hallin M; Martiny D
    J Microbiol Methods; 2022 Mar; 194():106433. PubMed ID: 35150789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Reliability of E-Tests and the Phoenix Automated Method in Assessing Susceptibility to IV Fosfomycin-Comparative Studies Relative to the Reference Method.
    Kowalska-Krochmal B; Mączyńska B; Smutnicka D; Secewicz A; Krochmal G; Laufer K; Dudek-Wicher R
    Pathogens; 2023 May; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 37242370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Assessment of version 2.5 of QMAC-dRAST for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with reduced sample-to-answer turnaround time and an integrated expert system.
    Grohs P; Picard S; Mainardi JL; Podglajen I
    Infect Dis Now; 2021 Aug; 51(5):470-476. PubMed ID: 34366083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evaluation of a commercial microtiter system (MicroScan) using both frozen and freeze-dried panels for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp.
    Fuller SA; Low DE; Simor AE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 May; 28(5):1051-3. PubMed ID: 2351721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.