BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20806086)

  • 1. Evaluation of atypical squamous cells on conventional cytology smears: An experience from a screening program practiced in limited resource settings.
    Rekhi B; Ajit D; Joseph SK; Gawas S; Deodhar KK
    Cytojournal; 2010 Aug; 7():15. PubMed ID: 20806086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distribution of human papillomavirus types in ThinPrep Papanicolaou tests classified according to the Bethesda 2001 terminology and correlations with patient age and biopsy outcomes.
    Evans MF; Adamson CS; Papillo JL; St John TL; Leiman G; Cooper K
    Cancer; 2006 Mar; 106(5):1054-64. PubMed ID: 16421920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytology and high risk HPV testing in cervical cancer screening program: Outcome of 3-year follow-up in an academic institute.
    Yang J; Nolte FS; Chajewski OS; Lindsey KG; Houser PM; Pellicier J; Wang Q; Ehsani L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Jan; 46(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 29048733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risks of CIN 2+, CIN 3+, and Cancer by Cytology and Human Papillomavirus Status: The Foundation of Risk-Based Cervical Screening Guidelines.
    Demarco M; Lorey TS; Fetterman B; Cheung LC; Guido RS; Wentzensen N; Kinney WK; Poitras NE; Befano B; Castle PE; Schiffman M
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Oct; 21(4):261-267. PubMed ID: 28953116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementation of the ThinPrep Imaging System in a tertiary military medical center.
    Duby JM; DiFurio MJ
    Cancer; 2009 Aug; 117(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 19536887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Cytonucleomorphometric Parameters for Cases Diagnosed as Squamous Cell Abnormality on Conventional Cervico-Vaginal Pap Smears.
    Mishra S; Khurana U; Kapoor N; Joshi A; Joshi D
    J Cytol; 2023; 40(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 37179967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with abnormal cytology].
    Ou H; Bian ML; Zhang XY; Chen QY; Li M; Chen Y; Liu J
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2007 Oct; 29(5):608-11. PubMed ID: 18051714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of Cervical Cancer Biomarkers p16 and Ki67 in Abnormal Cervical Cytological Smear.
    Gothwal M; Nalwa A; Singh P; Yadav G; Bhati M; Samriya N
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2021 Feb; 71(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 33814802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of the Differences between Bethesda Groups according to Conventional Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in Cervicovaginal Cytology: A Single-Center Experience with 165,915 Cases.
    Ucak R; Dilbaz OF; Polat N
    Acta Cytol; 2024; 68(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 38320537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage in Korean women: Revisiting the 2012 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology screening guidelines.
    Hyun JY; Min KJ; Yang SY; Lee JK; Hong JH
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2017 Jul; 60(4):357-361. PubMed ID: 28791267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcome of "Atypical squamous cells" in a cervical cytology screening program: implications for follow up in resource limited settings.
    Gupta S; Sodhani P; Chachra KL; Singh V; Sehgal A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):677-80. PubMed ID: 17924415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion/cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H) is a unique category of cytologic abnormality associated with distinctive HPV and histopathologic CIN 2+ detection rates.
    Barron S; Li Z; Austin RM; Zhao C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Feb; 141(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 24436272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnosis of Cervical Precancers by Endocervical Curettage at Colposcopy of Women With Abnormal Cervical Cytology.
    Liu AH; Walker J; Gage JC; Gold MA; Zuna R; Dunn ST; Schiffman M; Wentzensen N
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1218-1225. PubMed ID: 29112672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology in Bahrain: Reporting rates, high-risk HPV testing, and cytologic and histopathologic follow-up findings.
    Ismaeel A; Al-Shaikh S; Mubarak A; Ismaeel R
    Cytojournal; 2024; 21():11. PubMed ID: 38628291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of human papillomavirus DNA prevalence in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance subcategories as defined by the original Bethesda 1991 and the new Bethesda 2001 Systems.
    Pirog EC; Erroll M; Harigopal M; Centeno BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2004 May; 128(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 15086283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
    Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reflex Human Papillomavirus Test Results as an Option for the Management of Korean Women With Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
    Ryu KJ; Lee S; Min KJ; Kim JW; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
    Oncologist; 2015 Jun; 20(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 25964305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comment on diagnosis of atypical squamous cells using new the Bethesda system 2001].
    Wang Y; Bian ML; Liu J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 14989984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical significance of the diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Alsharif M; Kjeldahl K; Curran C; Miller S; Gulbahce HE; Pambuccian SE
    Cancer; 2009 Apr; 117(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 19365830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.