These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20807480)

  • 21. Comparison of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and loudness estimates for the stimuli used to program the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant.
    Jeon EK; Brown CJ; Etler CP; O'Brien S; Chiou LK; Abbas PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 20085196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
    Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech-in-Noise Recognition With More Realistic Implementations of a Binaural Cochlear-Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo López R; Gutiérrez Revilla MA; Schatzer R; Nopp P; Stohl JS
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1492-1510. PubMed ID: 33136626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 26055839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance benefits for adults using a cochlear implant with adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a comparative study.
    Müller-Deile J; Kiefer J; Wyss J; Nicolai J; Battmer R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2008 Mar; 9(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 18300224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
    Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech understanding in noise with the Roger Pen, Naida CI Q70 processor, and integrated Roger 17 receiver in a multi-talker network.
    De Ceulaer G; Bestel J; Mülder HE; Goldbeck F; de Varebeke SP; Govaerts PJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 May; 273(5):1107-14. PubMed ID: 25983309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].
    Weißgerber T
    HNO; 2019 Apr; 67(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 30859252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss.
    Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Spahr A; Rajguru S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):579-589. PubMed ID: 30541657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Litovsky RA; Strube MJ; Kuk F
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):353-73. PubMed ID: 19594084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Eichenauer A; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014118. PubMed ID: 34028332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.