These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20807513)

  • 1. Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.
    Couperus JW; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2010 Nov; 1359():155-77. PubMed ID: 20807513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
    Seiss E; Driver J; Eimer M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 120(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 19410504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.
    Serences JT; Yantis S; Culberson A; Awh E
    J Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 92(6):3538-45. PubMed ID: 15254075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
    J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparatory effects of distractor suppression: evidence from visual cortex.
    Munneke J; Heslenfeld DJ; Usrey WM; Theeuwes J; Mangun GR
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e27700. PubMed ID: 22164213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning What Is Irrelevant or Relevant: Expectations Facilitate Distractor Inhibition and Target Facilitation through Distinct Neural Mechanisms.
    van Moorselaar D; Slagter HA
    J Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 39(35):6953-6967. PubMed ID: 31270162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention.
    Antonov PA; Chakravarthi R; Andersen SK
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 219():117006. PubMed ID: 32485307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial Scaling of the Profile of Selective Attention in the Visual Field.
    Gannon MA; Knapp AA; Adams TG; Long SM; Parks NA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162190. PubMed ID: 27606426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression.
    Redding ZV; Fiebelkorn IC
    J Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 44(25):. PubMed ID: 38729761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategic Distractor Suppression Improves Selective Control in Human Vision.
    van Zoest W; Huber-Huber C; Weaver MD; Hickey C
    J Neurosci; 2021 Aug; 41(33):7120-7135. PubMed ID: 34244360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related Electroencephalographic Lateralizations Mark Individual Differences in Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Selection.
    Wiegand I; Napiórkowski N; Töllner T; Petersen A; Habekost T; Müller HJ; Finke K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 30(4):482-497. PubMed ID: 29244636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural correlates of goal-directed enhancement and suppression of visual stimuli in the absence of conscious perception.
    Travis SL; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1346-1364. PubMed ID: 30378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related Potentials Indicate Target Processing in the Absence of Distractor Suppression during Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.
    Peylo C; Glennon M; Sauseng P
    J Integr Neurosci; 2024 Apr; 23(5):88. PubMed ID: 38812398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.
    Sugimoto F; Katayama J
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():55-62. PubMed ID: 28377160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.
    Adams MS; Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 317():179-187. PubMed ID: 27641325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.