These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks. Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task. Wienrich C; Janczyk M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novelty and saliency in attentional capture by unannounced motion singletons. Becker SI; Horstmann G Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):290-9. PubMed ID: 21208608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive load modulates attentional capture by color singletons during effortful visual search. Burnham BR Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 20510910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations. Kerzel D; Born S; Schönhammer J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Dec; 38(6):1362-70. PubMed ID: 22428670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs. Wykowska A; Schubö A J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons. Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional capture by an unannounced color singleton depends on expectation discrepancy. Horstmann G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1039-60. PubMed ID: 16262497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search. Barras C; Kerzel D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons. Theeuwes J; De Vries GJ; Godijn R Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 12956581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture. Wu SC; Remington RW J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink. Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Lamy D; Egeth HE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods. Turatto M; Galfano G; Gardini S; Mascetti GG Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):297-324. PubMed ID: 14742178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Blink and shrink: the effect of the attentional blink on spatial processing. Olivers CN; Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 15161390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]