BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20807855)

  • 1. Assessment of patient exposure to X-radiation from SPECT/CT scanners.
    Hara N; Onoguchi M; Takenaka K; Matsubara K; Ujita H; Kenko Y
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2010 Sep; 38(3):138-48. PubMed ID: 20807855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [X-ray exposure dose control for x-ray CT system].
    Takagi H
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 12766284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SPECT-CT in routine clinical practice: increase in patient radiation dose compared with SPECT alone.
    Sharma P; Sharma S; Ballal S; Bal C; Malhotra A; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Sep; 33(9):926-32. PubMed ID: 22692583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operational radiation safety for PET-CT, SPECT-CT, and cyclotron facilities.
    Zanzonico P; Dauer L; St Germain J
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):554-70. PubMed ID: 18849690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
    Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
    Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols.
    Ho LM; Yoshizumi TT; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D; Toncheva G; Schindera ST
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 19596594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
    Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Estimation of effective dose from CT examination].
    Nishizawa K; Maruyama T; Takayama M; Iwai K; Furuya Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Sep; 55(11):763-8. PubMed ID: 8532509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Radiation exposure to patients caused by single-photon transmission measurement in PET].
    Schaefer A; Seifert H; Donsch P; Kirsch CM
    Nuklearmedizin; 2000 Nov; 39(7):204-8. PubMed ID: 11127049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biokinetic and dosimetric modelling in the estimation of radiation risks from internal emitters.
    Harrison J
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Jun; 29(2A):A81-A105. PubMed ID: 19454809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the total effective dose from low-dose CT scans and radiopharmaceutical administrations delivered to patients undergoing SPECT/CT explorations.
    Montes C; Tamayo P; Hernandez J; Gomez-Caminero F; García S; Martín C; Rosero A
    Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 27(7):610-7. PubMed ID: 23568252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: basic instrumentation and innovations.
    O'Connor MK; Kemp BJ
    Semin Nucl Med; 2006 Oct; 36(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 16950143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of skin exposure during cerebral CT perfusion studies on a phantom.
    Suzuki S; Kidouchi T; Yamamoto A; Machida H; Takei R; Ibukuro K; Mehta D
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):851-5. PubMed ID: 20932701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
    Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.