These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20808010)
1. Proximal femoral medullary canal diameters in Indians: correlation between anatomic, radiographic, and computed tomographic measurements. Sen RK; Tripathy SK; Kumar R; Kumar A; Dhatt S; Dhillon MS; Nagi ON; Gulati M J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2010 Aug; 18(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 20808010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total hip arthroplasty offset measurement: is C T scan the most accurate option? Pasquier G; Ducharne G; Ali ES; Giraud F; Mouttet A; Durante E Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Jun; 96(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 20471935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Anastopoulos G; Chissas D; Dourountakis J; Ntagiopoulos PG; Magnisalis E; Asimakopoulos A; Xenakis TA Injury; 2010 Mar; 41(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 20176170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional femoral morphology in Hartofilakidis type C developmental dysplastic hips and the implications for total hip arthroplasty. Wang Z; Li H; Zhou Y; Deng W Int Orthop; 2020 Oct; 44(10):1935-1942. PubMed ID: 32556383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur. Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Dimensional Morphological Analysis of Sex, Age, and Symmetry of Proximal Femurs from Computed Tomography: Application to Total Hip Arthroplasty. Sparks CA; Decker SJ; Ford JM Clin Anat; 2020 Jul; 33(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 31591757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Osteometry of the femora in Turkish individuals: a morphometric study in 114 cadaveric femora as an anatomic basis of femoral component design]. Atilla B; Oznur A; Cağlar O; Tokgözoğlu M; Alpaslan M Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 17483639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Radiographs Predict the Use of Modular Stems in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip? Peters CL; Chrastil J; Stoddard GJ; Erickson JA; Anderson MB; Pelt CE Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 26183845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs. Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Yue B; Rubash HE; Kwon YM; Li G Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Feb; 102(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 26867707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. Eckrich SG; Noble PC; Tullos HS J Arthroplasty; 1994 Aug; 9(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 7964774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of combined flexion and external rotation on measurements of the proximal femur from anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. O'Connor JD; Rutherford M; Hill JC; Beverland DE; Dunne NJ; Lennon AB Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Jun; 104(4):449-454. PubMed ID: 29653242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of limb rotation on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Radtke K; Becher C; Noll Y; Ostermeier S Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2010 Apr; 130(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 19898854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty. Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lecoz L; Flecher X; Argenson JN Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23806349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Confrontation of the radiographic preoperative planning with the postoperative data for uncemented total hip arthroplasty]. Debarge R; Lustig S; Neyret P; Ait Si Selmi T Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 18555863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur. Massin P; Geais L; Astoin E; Simondi M; Lavaste F J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jan; 15(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 10654469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of in situ neck-shaft angle and shortening measurements of the anatomically reduced, varus malreduced and shortened proximal femur: can we believe what we see on the postoperative films? Marmor M; Nystuen C; Ehemer N; McClellan RT; Matityahu A Injury; 2012 Jun; 43(6):846-9. PubMed ID: 22040694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morphometric analysis of the femur in cerebral palsy: 3-dimensional CT study. Gose S; Sakai T; Shibata T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K J Pediatr Orthop; 2010 Sep; 30(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 20733422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Lindner C; Wallis GA; Cootes TF Bone; 2014 Apr; 61(100):64-70. PubMed ID: 24440168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]