BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2080852)

  • 1. Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic data with special applications to bioequivalence studies.
    Powers J; Powers T
    Ann Rech Vet; 1990; 21 Suppl 1():87S-92S. PubMed ID: 2080852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistics in review Part I: graphics, data summary and linear models.
    Moran JL; Solomon PJ
    Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Mar; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 17352672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.
    Shen CF; Iglewicz B
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):65-90. PubMed ID: 8019585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Feb; 28(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 2307548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Hauschke D; Steinijans VW; Diletti E
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992; 30 Suppl 1():S37-43. PubMed ID: 1601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods for testing equality of means of health care costs in a paired design study.
    Zhou XH; Li C; Gao S; Tierney WM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(11):1703-20. PubMed ID: 11391697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applications of computer-intensive statistical methods to environmental research.
    Pitt DG; Kreutzweiser DP
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 1998 Feb; 39(2):78-97. PubMed ID: 9515080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating treatment means in a mixed-effect ANOVA model for bioequivalence studies.
    Hsuan FC
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):703-13. PubMed ID: 8241367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mixture-model approach for parallel testing for unequal variances.
    Bar HY; Booth JG; Wells MT
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Jan; 11(1):Article 8. PubMed ID: 22499680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An approach to select the appropriate statistical method for testing bioequivalence.
    Steyn HS; Koeleman HA; Gouws E; Ritschel WA
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):156-60. PubMed ID: 1822089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extension to the use of tolerance intervals for the assessment of individual bioequivalence.
    Esinhart JD; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 8019583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parametric versus non-parametric statistics in the analysis of randomized trials with non-normally distributed data.
    Vickers AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Nov; 5():35. PubMed ID: 16269081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro bioequivalence testing.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 12486751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Ehrhard K; Schmitz B; Thöne J
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 17222566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing efficiency and precision of data analysis: multivariate vs. univariate statistical techniques.
    Goodwin LD
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 6564529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-parametric and non-parametric methods for clinical trials with incomplete data.
    O'Brien PC; Zhang D; Bailey KR
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):341-58. PubMed ID: 15547952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials].
    Nicolas P; Tod M; Petitjean O
    Therapie; 1993; 48(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8356540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A three-step procedure for assessing bioequivalence in the general mixed model framework.
    Vuorinen J; Turunen J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2635-55. PubMed ID: 8981677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update on the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.
    Steinijans VW; Hauschke D
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1990 Mar; 28(3):105-10. PubMed ID: 2318545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.