190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20809364)
1. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Likelihood of additional work-up among women undergoing routine screening mammography: the impact of age, breast density, and hormone therapy use.
Carney PA; Kasales CJ; Tosteson AN; Weiss JE; Goodrich ME; Poplack SP; Wells WS; Titus-Ernstoff L
Prev Med; 2004 Jul; 39(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15207985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cumulative risk of a false-positive recall in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Thoresen S; Tretli S
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 101(7):1501-7. PubMed ID: 15378474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result.
Castells X; Román M; Romero A; Blanch J; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Burón A; Sala M;
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 23142338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What factors are associated with diagnostic follow-up after abnormal mammograms? Findings from a U.S. National Survey.
Yabroff KR; Breen N; Vernon SW; Meissner HI; Freedman AN; Ballard-Barbash R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 May; 13(5):723-32. PubMed ID: 15159302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. False-positive screening mammograms: effect of immediate versus later work-up on patient stress.
Lindfors KK; O'Connor J; Parker RA
Radiology; 2001 Jan; 218(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 11152810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the cumulative risk of false positive cancer screenings.
Baker SG; Erwin D; Kramer BS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Jul; 3():11. PubMed ID: 12841854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False-positive results from colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain), 2000-2010.
Garcia M; Milà N; Binefa G; Borràs JM; Espinàs JA; Moreno V
J Med Screen; 2012 Jun; 19(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 22653571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort study.
Maxwell AJ; Beattie C; Lavelle J; Lyburn I; Sinnatamby R; Garnett S; Herbert A
J Med Screen; 2013 Jun; 20(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 24009091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population-based study of breast cancer screening in Côte d'Or (France): clinical implications and factors affecting screening round adequacy.
Ouedraogo S; Dabakuyo TS; Gentil J; Poillot ML; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Nov; 20(6):462-74. PubMed ID: 22025137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
