BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20809722)

  • 1. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Sep; 13(3):308-18. PubMed ID: 20809722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Mummaneni PV; Burkus JK; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Zdeblick TA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):198-209. PubMed ID: 17355018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Argires PJ; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):558-573. PubMed ID: 26230424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement at 2 levels: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Dryer RG; Gornet MF; McConnell J; Hodges SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jul; 27(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 28387616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
    Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
    Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.
    Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
    Heller JG; Sasso RC; Papadopoulos SM; Anderson PA; Fessler RG; Hacker RJ; Coric D; Cauthen JC; Riew DK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 19112337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
    Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.
    Janssen ME; Zigler JE; Spivak JM; Delamarter RB; Darden BV; Kopjar B
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Nov; 97(21):1738-47. PubMed ID: 26537161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Sasso RC; Anderson PA; Riew KD; Heller JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(18):1684-92. PubMed ID: 21938372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.
    Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.