These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20809740)

  • 1. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Julin J; Jämsen E; Puolakka T; Konttinen YT; Moilanen T
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Aug; 81(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 20809740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Matched Comparison of the Long-Term Outcomes of Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.
    Mohammad HR; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Dec; 103(24):2270-2280. PubMed ID: 34543254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total Knee Replacement in Young Patients: Survival and Causes of Revision in a Registry Population.
    Castagnini F; Sudanese A; Bordini B; Tassinari E; Stea S; Toni A
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3368-3372. PubMed ID: 28655567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary constrained and hinged total knee arthroplasty: 2- and 5-year revision risk compared with unconstrained total knee arthroplasty: a report on 401 cases from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2017.
    Badawy M; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):467-472. PubMed ID: 31210080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of fixation type on the survivorship of contemporary total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years of age: a register-based study of 115,177 knees in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) 2000-2016.
    Niemeläinen MJ; Mäkelä KT; Robertsson O; W-Dahl A; Furnes O; Fenstad AM; Pedersen AB; Schrøder HM; Reito A; Eskelinen A
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):184-190. PubMed ID: 31928097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Surgical Caseload on Revision Rate Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacement.
    Liddle AD; Pandit H; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26738897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Koskinen E; Eskelinen A; Paavolainen P; Pulkkinen P; Remes V
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Aug; 79(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 18766483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Periprosthetic Fracture Rate of Unicompartmental and Total Knee Replacements: An Analysis of Data of >100,000 Knee Replacements from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man and Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Mohammad HR; Barker K; Judge A; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Dec; 105(23):1857-1866. PubMed ID: 37733918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Schrama JC; Espehaug B; Hallan G; Engesaeter LB; Furnes O; Havelin LI; Fevang BT
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2010 Apr; 62(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20391501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of survival rate and risk of revision for mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Lacko M; Schreierová D
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2019 Aug; 30(2):70-8. PubMed ID: 31291852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Major Aseptic Revision Following Total Knee Replacement: A Study of 478,081 Total Knee Replacements from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Jorgensen NB; McAuliffe M; Orschulok T; Lorimer MF; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(4):302-310. PubMed ID: 30801369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of single-anaesthetic versus staged bilateral primary total knee replacement: experience from the New Zealand National Joint Registry.
    Wyatt MC; Hozack J; Frampton C; Hooper GJ
    ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):567-572. PubMed ID: 30968551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased risk of early and medium-term revision after post-fracture total knee arthroplasty.
    El-Galaly A; Haldrup S; Pedersen AB; Kappel A; Jensen MU; Nielsen PT
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Jun; 88(3):263-268. PubMed ID: 28464756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Five-Year Survival of 20,946 Unicondylar Knee Replacements and Patient Risk Factors for Failure: An Analysis of German Insurance Data.
    Jeschke E; Gehrke T; Günster C; Hassenpflug J; Malzahn J; Niethard FU; Schräder P; Zacher J; Halder A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(20):1691-1698. PubMed ID: 27869619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of revision for fixed versus mobile-bearing primary total knee replacements.
    Namba RS; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Ake CF; Wang C; Gross TP; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Nov; 94(21):1929-35. PubMed ID: 23138235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.
    Evans JT; Walker RW; Evans JP; Blom AW; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10172):655-663. PubMed ID: 30782341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study.
    Bayliss LE; Culliford D; Monk AP; Glyn-Jones S; Prieto-Alhambra D; Judge A; Cooper C; Carr AJ; Arden NK; Beard DJ; Price AJ
    Lancet; 2017 Apr; 389(10077):1424-1430. PubMed ID: 28209371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
    Liddle AD; Judge A; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Lancet; 2014 Oct; 384(9952):1437-45. PubMed ID: 25012116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for 43,525 rotating-platform vs. fixed-bearing total knee replacements.
    Gothesen O; Lygre SHL; Lorimer M; Graves S; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):649-656. PubMed ID: 28929828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.
    Puijk R; Sierevelt IN; Pijls BGCW; Spekenbrink-Spooren A; Nolte PA
    Acta Orthop; 2023 Dec; 94():600-606. PubMed ID: 38093649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.