1810 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20809864)
1. Risk assessment before extraction for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a computerized tomographic scan study.
Froum S; Casanova L; Byrne S; Cho SC
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 20809864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study.
Lin MH; Mau LP; Cochran DL; Shieh YS; Huang PH; Huang RY
J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 24394585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed Tomography for the Assessment of the Potential Risk After Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sites in the Posterior Mandible.
Haj Yahya B; Chaushu G; Hamzani Y
J Oral Implantol; 2021 Feb; 47(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 32662837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review.
Greenstein G; Tarnow D
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1933-43. PubMed ID: 17209776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk assessment of lingual plate perforation in posterior mandibular region: a virtual implant placement study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Chan HL; Benavides E; Yeh CY; Fu JH; Rudek IE; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20653440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of lingual plate perforation during implant placement in the posterior mandible: a human cadaver study.
Leong DJ; Chan HL; Yeh CY; Takarakis N; Fu JH; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 21811168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A study on effects of immediate bone grafting at mandibular first molar fresh extraction socket on maintaining alveolar bone height after space closure].
Chen QX; Zhou ZB; Zhou YH
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):649-655. PubMed ID: 29972942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of lingual plate perforation for virtual immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: A computer simulation study.
Huang RY; Cochran DL; Cheng WC; Lin MH; Fan WH; Sung CE; Mau LP; Huang PH; Shieh YS
J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Oct; 146(10):735-42. PubMed ID: 26409983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography.
Nakayama K; Nonoyama M; Takaki Y; Kagawa T; Yuasa K; Izumi K; Ozeki S; Ikebe T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 67(12):2587-91. PubMed ID: 19925976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations.
Block MS; Mercante DE; Lirette D; Mohamed W; Ryser M; Castellon P
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov; 67(11 Suppl):89-107. PubMed ID: 19835754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Velvart P; Hecker H; Tillinger G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Dec; 92(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 11740486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors that are associated with injury to the inferior alveolar nerve in high-risk patients after removal of third molars.
Selvi F; Dodson TB; Nattestad A; Robertson K; Tolstunov L
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):868-73. PubMed ID: 24012054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of the lingual nerve during periodontal/implant surgery.
Chan HL; Leong DJ; Fu JH; Yeh CY; Tatarakis N; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):372-7. PubMed ID: 20192863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation.
Araújo MG; Wennström JL; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Dec; 17(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 17092217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Buccal bone plate in the immediately placed and restored maxillary single implant: a 7-year retrospective study using computed tomography.
Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 22228461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alveolar bone resorption after primary tooth loss has a negative impact on straightforward implant installation in patients with agenesis of the lower second premolar.
Bertl K; Bertl MH; Heimel P; Burt M; Gahleitner A; Stavropoulos A; Ulm C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Feb; 29(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 28736870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding injury to the inferior alveolar nerve by routine use of intraoperative radiographs during implant placement.
Burstein J; Mastin C; Le B
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 18390241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
