1817 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20809864)
21. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction sites: a 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study.
Cafiero C; Annibali S; Gherlone E; Grassi FR; Gualini F; Magliano A; Romeo E; Tonelli P; Lang NP; Salvi GE;
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 May; 19(5):476-82. PubMed ID: 18416726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog.
Araújo MG; Sukekava F; Wennström JL; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 15882225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Potential Circumferential Bone Engagement following Tooth Extraction in the Posterior Mandible: Computed Tomography Assessment.
Hamzani Y; Yassien E; Moskovich L; Becker T; Chaushu G; Haj Yahya B
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Aug; 57(9):. PubMed ID: 34577797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Anatomic relationship between impacted third mandibular molar and the mandibular canal as the risk factor of inferior alveolar nerve injury.
Xu GZ; Yang C; Fan XD; Yu CQ; Cai XY; Wang Y; He D
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):e215-9. PubMed ID: 23411471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The success rate of immediate implant placement of mandibular molars: a clinical and radiographic retrospective evaluation between 2 and 8 years.
Hayacibara RM; Gonçalves CS; Garcez-Filho J; Magro-Filho O; Esper H; Hayacibara MF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):806-11. PubMed ID: 22462471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ridge dimensions of the edentulous posterior maxilla: a retrospective analysis of a cohort of 127 patients using computerized tomography data.
Pramstraller M; Farina R; Franceschetti G; Pramstraller C; Trombelli L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 20831759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction.
Peng KY; Tseng YC; Shen EC; Chiu SC; Fu E; Huang YW
J Periodontol; 2001 Dec; 72(12):1647-51. PubMed ID: 11811499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dimensional ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites: a six-month prospective cohort study with surgical re-entry.
Matarasso S; Salvi GE; Iorio Siciliano V; Cafiero C; Blasi A; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1092-8. PubMed ID: 19719737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Kanewoff E; Alhallak R; de Carvalho Machado V; Chrcanovic BR
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):393. PubMed ID: 38539122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Efficacy of Immediate Implant Placement in Extraction Sockets for Alveolar Bone Preservation: A Clinical Evaluation Using Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computerized Tomography and Resonance Frequency Analysis Value.
Qabbani AA; Razak NHA; Kawas SA; Sheikh Abdul Hamid S; Wahbi S; Samsudin AR
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):e318-e325. PubMed ID: 28230596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Anatomic considerations for immediate implant placement in the mandibular molar region: a cross-sectional study using cone-beam computed tomography.
Ho JY; Ngeow WC; Lim D; Wong CS
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(3):732-738. PubMed ID: 34184752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Monnerat C; Restle L; Mucha JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study.
Chen H; Wang W; Gu X
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Sep; 21(1):478. PubMed ID: 34579702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Position of the mental foramen on panoramic radiographs and its relation to the horizontal course of the mandibular canal: a computed tomographic analysis.
Pyun JH; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Ahn SJ; Kim J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):890-5. PubMed ID: 22220715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and radiographic performance of delayed-immediate single-tooth implant placement associated with peri-implant bone defects. A 2-year prospective, controlled, randomized follow-up report.
Schropp L; Kostopoulos L; Wenzel A; Isidor F
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 15842263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Alveolar bone remodeling around immediate implants placed in accordance with the extraction socket classification: a three-dimensional microcomputed tomography analysis.
Al-Shabeeb MS; Al-Askar M; Al-Rasheed A; Babay N; Javed F; Wang HL; Al-Hezaimi K
J Periodontol; 2012 Aug; 83(8):981-7. PubMed ID: 22166163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement and the treatment of bone defects with Bio-Oss in an animal model.
Hsu KM; Choi BH; Ko CY; Kim HS; Xuan F; Jeong SM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):690-5. PubMed ID: 20977617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT.
Sun Y; Hu S; Xie Z; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):76. PubMed ID: 36747164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation.
Huang Y; Van Dessel J; Liang X; Depypere M; Zhong W; Ma G; Lambrichts I; Maes F; Jacobs R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):873-83. PubMed ID: 23551564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessment of the risk of perforation of the mandibular canal by implant drill using density and thickness parameters.
Başa O; Dilek OC
Gerodontology; 2011 Sep; 28(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 20236331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
