These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20810103)

  • 1. Mathematical model of the coagulation in the bone-dental implant interface.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Oct; 40(10):791-801. PubMed ID: 20810103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A finite element method approach for the mechanobiological modeling of the osseointegration of a dental implant.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Landinez P NS; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Casale R MC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Mar; 101(3):297-314. PubMed ID: 21183241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical investigation into blood clotting at the bone-dental implant interface in the presence of an electrical stimulus.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Lancellotti V
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Dec; 43(12):2079-88. PubMed ID: 24290924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 1: Mathematical model.
    Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 18762197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone ingrowth on the surface of endosseous implants. Part 2: Theoretical and numerical analysis.
    Moreo P; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 19524597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical simulation of bone regeneration in a bone chamber.
    Geris L; Vandamme K; Naert I; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Van Oosterwyck H
    J Dent Res; 2009 Feb; 88(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19278988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
    Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature.
    Geng JP; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):585-98. PubMed ID: 11404759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical simulation of electrically stimulated osteogenesis in dental implants.
    Vanegas-Acosta JC; Garzón-Alvarado DA; Lancellotti V
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2014 Apr; 96():21-36. PubMed ID: 24413341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach.
    Natali AN; Pavan PG; Ruggero AL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16441786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of bone to implant contact percentage on bone remodelling surrounding a dental implant.
    Lian Z; Guan H; Ivanovski S; Loo YC; Johnson NW; Zhang H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 39(7):690-8. PubMed ID: 20418064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A finite element stress analysis of the transmandibular implant system.
    Williams KR; Murphy WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 11843446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.