BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20811768)

  • 1. Design and development of EMR supporting medical process management.
    Li JS; Zhang XG; Chu J; Suzuki M; Araki K
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1193-203. PubMed ID: 20811768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; de Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):548-58. PubMed ID: 24969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.
    Top M; Yilmaz A; Karabulut E; Otieno OG; Saylam M; Bakır S; Top S
    J Med Syst; 2015 Jun; 39(6):67. PubMed ID: 25957164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment of an electronic medical record in a psychiatric hospital: evolution of professionals' perceptions].
    Boyer L; Renaud MH; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Fieschi M; Samuelian JC
    Encephale; 2010 Jun; 36(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20620266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital.
    Kim S; Lee KH; Hwang H; Yoo S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Jan; 16():12. PubMed ID: 26831123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a professionals' satisfaction questionnaire with electronic medical records (PSQ-EMR) in psychiatry.
    Boyer L; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Belzeaux R; Azorin JM; Chabannes JM; Dassa D; Lancon C; Naudin J; Poinso F; Rufo M; Samuelian JC; Loundou A; Fieschi M; Auquier P
    Eur Psychiatry; 2011 Mar; 26(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 20418071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physicians' acceptance of electronic medical records exchange: an extension of the decomposed TPB model with institutional trust and perceived risk.
    Hsieh PJ
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Jan; 84(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25242228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electronic medical records in solo/small groups: a qualitative study of physician user types.
    Miller RH; Sim I; Newman J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):658-62. PubMed ID: 15360895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerizing medical records in Japan.
    Yasunaga H; Imamura T; Yamaki S; Endo H
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Oct; 77(10):708-13. PubMed ID: 18448385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.
    Boonstra A; Broekhuis M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 10():231. PubMed ID: 20691097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.
    Trudel MC; Marsan J; Paré G; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Maillet É; Micheneau T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):46. PubMed ID: 28427405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Case study: analysis of end-user requests on electronic medical record and computerized physician order entry system of Seoul National University Hospital in Korea.
    Kim YA; Shin SY; Jo EM; Park CH; Hwang MA; Kim KH; Chung CK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):169-72. PubMed ID: 20841671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of an electronic medical record system in previously computer-naïve primary care centres: a pilot study from Cyprus.
    Samoutis G; Soteriades ES; Kounalakis DK; Zachariadou T; Philalithis A; Lionis C
    Inform Prim Care; 2007; 15(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 18237477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Framework to Enhance Nurses' Use of EMR.
    Parthasarathy R; Steinbach T; Knight J; Knight L
    Hosp Top; 2018; 96(3):85-93. PubMed ID: 30277450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.
    Top M; Gider O
    J Med Syst; 2012 Jun; 36(3):1979-88. PubMed ID: 21302133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Going digital: a checklist in preparing for hospital-wide electronic medical record implementation and digital transformation.
    Scott IA; Sullivan C; Staib A
    Aust Health Rev; 2019 Jul; 43(3):302-313. PubMed ID: 29792259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
    Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.