153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20811837)
1. Reproductive 'choice' and egg freezing.
Petropanagos A
Cancer Treat Res; 2010; 156():223-35. PubMed ID: 20811837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy?
Harwood K
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18945249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Infertility and reproductive choice.
Lewis JA
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2010; 35(3):129. PubMed ID: 20453586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rich discussion about reproductive autonomy.
McLeod C
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 19076936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A reply to Karey Harwood. Egg freezing and autonomy.
Bittner U
Bioethics; 2009 Nov; 23(9):525. PubMed ID: 19659849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In favour of freezing eggs for non-medical reasons.
Goold I; Savulescu J
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 19076941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rights and procreative liberty.
Schroeder D
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):325. PubMed ID: 17695626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Let us talk about eggs! Professional resistance to elective egg vitrification and gendered medical paternalism.
Sándor J; Vicsek L; Bauer Z
Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Sep; 21(3):311-323. PubMed ID: 29027632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Permitting sex selection.
Wilkinson M
N Z Med J; 2009 Jun; 122(1296):90-1. PubMed ID: 19652689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Social egg freezing and reproductive rights justification: A perspective from China.
Wang Z; Fan Y; Shao W
Bioethics; 2024 May; 38(4):326-334. PubMed ID: 38363981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The moral imperative for ectogenesis.
Smajdor A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 17695628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Parental love and the ethics of sex selection.
Herissone-Kelly P
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2007; 16(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 17695627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing.
Baldwin K; Culley L; Hudson N; Mitchell H
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Sep; 17(3):170-9. PubMed ID: 25093571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Competitive framing processes in the abortion debate: polarization-vilification, frame saving, and frame debunking.
McCaffrey D; Keys J
Sociol Q; 2000; 41(1):41-61. PubMed ID: 19536934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pregnancy for others: the strange French schizophrenia].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2015 May; 11(476):1212-3. PubMed ID: 26182644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Politics, power, and sexual and reproductive health and rights: impacts and opportunities.
Pugh S
Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2019 May; 27(2):1662616. PubMed ID: 31524106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive autonomy is an illusion.
Lucke JC
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):44-5. PubMed ID: 22650462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethical status of prophylactic interventions in children: ovarian tissue cryopreservation and vaccination.
Ungar LD; Ladd JM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):50-2. PubMed ID: 22650465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Juvenile ovarian tissue cryopreservation and social justice: an imperative to broaden the discussion.
Crozier GK; Michaud B
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 22650463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications of the Trump Administration for sexual and reproductive rights globally.
Girard F
Reprod Health Matters; 2017; 25(49):1301028. PubMed ID: 28784077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
