These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20811837)

  • 21. Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay.
    Baldwin K
    Sociol Health Illn; 2018 Jun; 40(5):859-873. PubMed ID: 29602235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preserving capabilities.
    Brooks T
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):48-9. PubMed ID: 22650464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Reproductive cloning: the importance of refusing that which pushes the limits].
    Martin J
    Rev Med Suisse; 2009 Mar; 5(193):542-3. PubMed ID: 19374053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproductive function: the protection of the rights of the people which are sent to the area of the fighting.
    Pashkov V; Gutorova N; Noha P
    Wiad Lek; 2018; 71(2 pt 2):403-407. PubMed ID: 29786593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The missing piece(s).
    Galvin K; Clayman ML
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):52-3. PubMed ID: 22650466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
    Parks J
    Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Men and talk about legal abortion in South Africa: equality, support and rights discourses undermining reproductive 'choice'.
    Macleod CI; Hansjee J
    Cult Health Sex; 2013; 15(8):997-1010. PubMed ID: 23768420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reframing the justice implications of preserving the right to future children.
    McGowan ML; Redding J
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(6):53-5. PubMed ID: 22650467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frozen embryos, genetic information and reproductive rights.
    Chan S; Quigley M
    Bioethics; 2007 Oct; 21(8):439-48. PubMed ID: 17845450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The right to reproduce.
    Chadwick RF
    Mod Churchm; 1987; 29(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 16127859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Rethinking progenitive conflict: why reproductive autonomy matters.
    Priaulx N
    Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):169-200. PubMed ID: 18413356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The right to found a family as a stillborn right to procreate?
    Eijkholt M
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 20513794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
    Arellano Mde J
    Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is egg freezing a good response to socioeconomic and cultural factors that lead women to postpone motherhood?
    Bozzaro C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 May; 36(5):594-603. PubMed ID: 29530402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Medical, ethical and legal issues in cryopreservation of human embryos].
    Beca JP; Lecaros A; González P; Sanhueza P; Mandakovic B
    Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jul; 142(7):903-8. PubMed ID: 25378010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Critical analysis on the evolution of ethical norms for the use of assisted reproduction techniques in Brazil].
    Leite TH
    Cien Saude Colet; 2019 Mar; 24(3):917-928. PubMed ID: 30892513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sex selection and the procreative liberty framework.
    de Melo-Martín I
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2013 Mar; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 23678627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Little consensus on egg freezing.
    Maher B
    Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):958. PubMed ID: 17960199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic screening and reproductive choice: is making a child to save another unethical?
    Simonstein F
    Med Law; 2005 Dec; 24(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 16440870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Female genital mutilation or cutting: an updated medico-legal analysis.
    Mathews B; Dallaston E
    Med J Aust; 2020 Oct; 213(7):309-311.e1. PubMed ID: 32924148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.