These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20812301)

  • 1. A note on dichotomization of continuous response variable in the presence of contamination and model misspecification.
    Shentu Y; Xie M
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(21):2200-14. PubMed ID: 20812301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An improved test of latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for group testing data.
    Huang X
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3316-27. PubMed ID: 19691036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables.
    Smithson M; Verkuilen J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 16594767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized linear models with ordinally-observed covariates.
    Johnson TR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):275-300. PubMed ID: 17067413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A hierarchical model for binary data with dependence between the design and outcome success probabilities.
    Todem D; Williams KP
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2967-88. PubMed ID: 19642075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some cautions on the use of instrumental variables estimators in outcomes research: how bias in instrumental variables estimators is affected by instrument strength, instrument contamination, and sample size.
    Crown WH; Henk HJ; Vanness DJ
    Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1078-84. PubMed ID: 22152177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian adjustment for covariate measurement errors: a flexible parametric approach.
    Hossain S; Gustafson P
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(11):1580-600. PubMed ID: 19226564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of prediction error for survival models.
    Lawless JF; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 19882678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
    Paoletti X; Kramar A
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing for misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.
    Abad AA; Litière S; Molenberghs G
    Biostatistics; 2010 Oct; 11(4):771-86. PubMed ID: 20407039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mining pharmacovigilance data using Bayesian logistic regression with James-Stein type shrinkage estimation.
    An L; Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):998-1012. PubMed ID: 20721787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating linear regression models in the presence of a censored independent variable.
    Austin PC; Hoch JS
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):411-29. PubMed ID: 14748036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum likelihood estimation of correction for dilution bias in simple linear regression using replicates from subjects with extreme first measurements.
    Berglund L; Garmo H; Lindbäck J; Svärdsudd K; Zethelius B
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4397-407. PubMed ID: 18618419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mixture models for continuous data in dose-response studies when some animals are unaffected by treatment.
    Boos DD; Brownie C
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1489-504. PubMed ID: 1786327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A robust method for proportional hazards regression.
    Minder CE; Bednarski T
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):1033-47. PubMed ID: 8783440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
    Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical approaches to analyse patient-reported outcomes as response variables: an application to health-related quality of life.
    Arostegui I; Núñez-Antón V; Quintana JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2012 Apr; 21(2):189-214. PubMed ID: 20858689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.