208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20812324)
1. VoteDock: consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions.
Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; von Grotthuss M; Rychlewski L; Ginalski K
J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):568-81. PubMed ID: 20812324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database.
Plewczynski D; Łaźniewski M; Augustyniak R; Ginalski K
J Comput Chem; 2011 Mar; 32(4):742-55. PubMed ID: 20812323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance.
Sato H; Shewchuk LM; Tang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2552-62. PubMed ID: 17125195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence.
Namasivayam V; Günther R
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine-learning scoring functions for identifying native poses of ligands docked to known and novel proteins.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S3. PubMed ID: 25916860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficient conformational sampling and weak scoring in docking programs? Strategy of the wisdom of crowds.
Chaput L; Mouawad L
J Cheminform; 2017 Jun; 9(1):37. PubMed ID: 29086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GSScore: a novel Graphormer-based shell-like scoring method for protein-ligand docking.
Guo L; Wang J
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38706316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Performance of Several Docking Programs at Reproducing Protein-Macrolide-Like Crystal Structures.
Castro-Alvarez A; Costa AM; Vilarrasa J
Molecules; 2017 Jan; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 28106755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular docking of intercalators and groove-binders to nucleic acids using Autodock and Surflex.
Holt PA; Chaires JB; Trent JO
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1602-15. PubMed ID: 18642866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets.
Xu W; Lucke AJ; Fairlie DP
J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Apr; 57():76-88. PubMed ID: 25682361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
