These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081247)

  • 1. How trustworthy is epidemiologic research?
    Vandenbroucke JP
    Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 2081247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Six red flags for suspect work.
    Begley CG
    Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):433-4. PubMed ID: 23698428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [From misconduct to scientific probity: a turning towards prevention].
    Sylvain H
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2001 Sep; (66):4-15. PubMed ID: 12038284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research misconduct events increased yet again in 2002.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2. PubMed ID: 14682337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
    Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U
    Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should an expected number of cases be an integer?
    Strömberg U
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):561-2. PubMed ID: 7986875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room?
    Luther F
    J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Leading by example.
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):229. PubMed ID: 17230151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ten anti-commandments in epidemiology or how to fail in epidemiology].
    Chêne G; Morlat P; Salamon R
    Can J Public Health; 1996; 87(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 8753632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media].
    Enoki E
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 29607989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In defense of black box epidemiology.
    Savitz DA
    Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):550-2. PubMed ID: 7986872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life.
    Feinstein AR
    Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4883):1257-63. PubMed ID: 3057627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
    Soskolne CL
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recent Progress in Promoting Research Integrity].
    Tanaka S
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(4):477-486. PubMed ID: 29607992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: "Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
    Vandenbroucke JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(9):1007-9. PubMed ID: 7572968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing fraudulent baseline data in clinical trials.
    Proschan MA; Shaw PA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239121. PubMed ID: 32998158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research scientists: endemic fraud.
    Prescrire Int; 2013 May; 22(138):116. PubMed ID: 23819167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Research fraud--an increasing ethical problem].
    Scherstén T
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Apr; 89(15):1307-10. PubMed ID: 1579003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research fundamentals VI: misconduct in biomedical research.
    Biros MH; Fish SS; Taggart P
    Acad Emerg Med; 1999 Aug; 6(8):840-8. PubMed ID: 10463558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.