These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081247)
1. How trustworthy is epidemiologic research? Vandenbroucke JP Epidemiology; 1990 Jan; 1(1):83-4. PubMed ID: 2081247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Six red flags for suspect work. Begley CG Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):433-4. PubMed ID: 23698428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [From misconduct to scientific probity: a turning towards prevention]. Sylvain H Rech Soins Infirm; 2001 Sep; (66):4-15. PubMed ID: 12038284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research misconduct events increased yet again in 2002. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2. PubMed ID: 14682337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Should an expected number of cases be an integer? Strömberg U Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):561-2. PubMed ID: 7986875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientific misconduct: tip of an iceberg or the elephant in the room? Luther F J Dent Res; 2010 Dec; 89(12):1364-7. PubMed ID: 20940367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Leading by example. Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):229. PubMed ID: 17230151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ten anti-commandments in epidemiology or how to fail in epidemiology]. Chêne G; Morlat P; Salamon R Can J Public Health; 1996; 87(2):84-5. PubMed ID: 8753632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media]. Enoki E Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 29607989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In defense of black box epidemiology. Savitz DA Epidemiology; 1994 Sep; 5(5):550-2. PubMed ID: 7986872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific standards in epidemiologic studies of the menace of daily life. Feinstein AR Science; 1988 Dec; 242(4883):1257-63. PubMed ID: 3057627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties. Soskolne CL J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recent Progress in Promoting Research Integrity]. Tanaka S Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(4):477-486. PubMed ID: 29607992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Re: "Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods". Vandenbroucke JP Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(9):1007-9. PubMed ID: 7572968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The science of retraction. Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosing fraudulent baseline data in clinical trials. Proschan MA; Shaw PA PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239121. PubMed ID: 32998158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]