These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081259)

  • 1. Indirect assessment of confounding: graphic description and limits on effect of adjusting for covariates.
    Flanders WD; Khoury MJ
    Epidemiology; 1990 May; 1(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 2081259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusted odds ratios for case-control studies with missing confounder data in controls.
    Suissa S; Edwardes MD
    Epidemiology; 1997 May; 8(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 9115022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of confounder in epidemiologic data contaminated by measurement error in covariates.
    Lee PH; Burstyn I
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():54. PubMed ID: 27193095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indirect adjustment of relative risks of an exposure with multiple categories for an unmeasured confounder.
    Lubin JH; Hauptmann M; Blair A
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):801-807. PubMed ID: 30297163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a clearer understanding of causal concepts in epidemiology.
    Maldonado G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 23(12):743-9. PubMed ID: 24404565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.
    Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
    Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):48-53.e2. PubMed ID: 29241736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlling for continuous confounders in epidemiologic research.
    Brenner H; Blettner M
    Epidemiology; 1997 Jul; 8(4):429-34. PubMed ID: 9209859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the role of marginal confounder prevalence - implications for the high-dimensional propensity score algorithm.
    Schuster T; Pang M; Platt RW
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1004-7. PubMed ID: 25866189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cautions in the use of antecedents as surrogates for confounders.
    Alderman BW; Barón AE; Savitz DA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Jun; 137(11):1259-72. PubMed ID: 8322766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The control of confounding by intermediate variables.
    Robins J
    Stat Med; 1989 Jun; 8(6):679-701. PubMed ID: 2749074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Causality and confounding in epidemiology].
    Stang A
    Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Dec; 73(12):884-7. PubMed ID: 22193897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using generalized additive models to reduce residual confounding.
    Benedetti A; Abrahamowicz M
    Stat Med; 2004 Dec; 23(24):3781-801. PubMed ID: 15580601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of confounders in the assessment of the relationship between lead exposure and child development.
    Tong IS; Lu Y
    Ann Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 11(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 11164118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
    Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditions for confounding of interactions.
    Liu A; Abrahamowicz M; Siemiatycki J
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Mar; 25(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 26676843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of nondifferential confounder misclassification in ecologic studies.
    Brenner H; Greenland S; Savitz DA
    Epidemiology; 1992 Sep; 3(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 1391140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Controlling for continuous confounding factors: non- and semiparametric approaches.
    Slama R; Werwatz A
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2005 Nov; 53 Spec No 2():2S65-80. PubMed ID: 16471146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Principles of confounder selection.
    VanderWeele TJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 34(3):211-219. PubMed ID: 30840181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
    Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.