These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20815064)
1. Post-processing correction of the endorectal coil reception effects in MR spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Noworolski SM; Reed GD; Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):654-62. PubMed ID: 20815064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. Lian J; Xing L; Hunjan S; Dumoulin C; Levin J; Lo A; Watkins R; Rohling K; Giaquinto R; Kim D; Spielman D; Daniel B Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3087-94. PubMed ID: 15587662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. Kurhanewicz J; Vigneron DB; Hricak H; Narayan P; Carroll P; Nelson SJ Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):795-805. PubMed ID: 8628874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-Quality 3-Dimensional 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate Without Endorectal Receive Coil Using A Semi-LASER Sequence. Tayari N; Steinseifer IK; Selnæs KM; Bathen TF; Maas MC; Heerschap A Invest Radiol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):640-646. PubMed ID: 28632688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil? Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. (31) P MR spectroscopic imaging combined with (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging in the human prostate using a double tuned endorectal coil at 7T. Luttje MP; Italiaander MG; Arteaga de Castro CS; van der Kemp WJ; Luijten PR; van Vulpen M; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1516-21. PubMed ID: 24357271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temporal B0 field variation effects on MRSI of the human prostate at 7 T and feasibility of correction using an internal field probe. Arteaga de Castro CS; Boer VO; Luttje MP; van der Velden TA; Bhogal A; van Vulpen M; Luijten PR; van der Heide UA; Klomp DW NMR Biomed; 2014 Nov; 27(11):1353-60. PubMed ID: 25212868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combined MRI and MRS in prostate cancer: improvement of spectral quality by susceptibility matching. Scheidler J; Vogel M; Gross P; Heuck A Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 19353482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical comparison of rigid and inflatable endorectal-coil probes for MRI and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the prostate. Noworolski SM; Crane JC; Vigneron DB; Kurhanewicz J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 18407539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies. Schreibmann E; Xing L Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 15890605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uniform prostate imaging and spectroscopy at 7 T: comparison between a microstrip array and an endorectal coil. van den Bergen B; Klomp DW; Raaijmakers AJ; de Castro CA; Boer VO; Kroeze H; Luijten PR; Lagendijk JJ; van den Berg CA NMR Biomed; 2011 May; 24(4):358-65. PubMed ID: 20960577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial results of 3-dimensional 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in the localization of prostate cancer at 3 Tesla: should we use an endorectal coil? Yakar D; Heijmink SW; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Huisman H; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ; Scheenen TW Invest Radiol; 2011 May; 46(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 21217527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 1.5tesla with endorectal coil versus 3.0tesla without endorectal coil: comparison of spectral quality. De Visschere P; Nezzo M; Pattyn E; Fonteyne V; Van Praet C; Villeirs G Clin Imaging; 2015; 39(4):636-41. PubMed ID: 25735448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-field MRSI of the prostate using a transmit/receive endorectal coil and gradient modulated adiabatic localization. Near J; Romagnoli C; Curtis AT; Klassen LM; Izawa J; Chin J; Bartha R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Aug; 30(2):335-43. PubMed ID: 19629986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with and without an endorectal coil: a prostate phantom study. Ma C; Chen L; Scheenen TW; Lu J; Wang J Acta Radiol; 2015 Nov; 56(11):1342-9. PubMed ID: 25348479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of endorectal magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in two different Gleason scores in prostate cancer. Nagarajan R; Margolis D; McClure T; Raman S; Thomas MA Med Princ Pract; 2011; 20(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 21757934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proton spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 7 T. Klomp DW; Bitz AK; Heerschap A; Scheenen TW NMR Biomed; 2009 Jun; 22(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 19170072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer using a standard spine coil at 1.5 T in clinical routine: a feasibility study. Lichy MP; Pintaske J; Kottke R; Machann J; Anastasiadis A; Roell S; Hennenlotter J; Diergarten T; Schick F; Stenzl A; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP Eur Radiol; 2005 Apr; 15(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 15627193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of human prostate at 3 T without endorectal coil: feasibility. Scheenen TW; Heijmink SW; Roell SA; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Heerschap A Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):507-16. PubMed ID: 17848681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. Wu X; Dibiase SJ; Gullapalli R; Yu CX Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Apr; 58(5):1577-83. PubMed ID: 15050339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]