181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20815075)
1. Reversed laminar appearance of articular cartilage by T1-weighting in 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) imaging.
Xia Y; Zheng S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):733-7. PubMed ID: 20815075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15068938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of articular cartilage: three-dimensional T1 mapping with variable flip angles and B1 correction.
Andreisek G; White LM; Yang Y; Robinson E; Cheng HL; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):865-73. PubMed ID: 19703855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rapid and robust variable flip angle T
Heule R; Bieri O
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Apr; 77(4):1606-1611. PubMed ID: 27098885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR imaging of knee cartilage with FEMR.
Vasnawala SS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG; Gold GE
Skeletal Radiol; 2002 Oct; 31(10):574-80. PubMed ID: 12324826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid isotropic resolution cartilage assessment using radial alternating repetition time balanced steady-state free-precession imaging.
Al saleh H; Hernandez L; Lee KS; Rosas HG; Block WF; Kijowski R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):796-803. PubMed ID: 24151247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial-spectral spoiled gradient-echo vs. fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging.
Yoshioka H; Alley M; Steines D; Stevens K; Rubesova E; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 12815641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison between pig lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple magnetic resonance image sequences and gross specimens].
Liao H; Yu W; Wang W; Liao Y
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 35(10):1064-72. PubMed ID: 21051831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simultaneous fat-free isotropic 3D anatomical imaging and T
Colotti R; Omoumi P; van Heeswijk RB; Bastiaansen JAM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1275-1284. PubMed ID: 30318667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Solid bone tumors of the spine: Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient measured using diffusion-weighted MRI using histology as a reference standard.
Pozzi G; Albano D; Messina C; Angileri SA; Al-Mnayyis A; Galbusera F; Luzzati A; Perrucchini G; Scotto G; Parafioriti A; Zerbi A; Sconfienza LM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1034-1042. PubMed ID: 28755383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-echo planar imaging: comparison with fat-suppressed 3D-T1-weighted-gradient echo in imaging the cartilage of the knee.
Karantanas AH; Zibis AH; Kitsoulis P
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 11918977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
