178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20815075)
21. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage.
Hardy PA; Recht MP; Piraino D; Thomasson D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 9132098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human articular cartilage: in vitro correlation of MRI and histologic findings.
Uhl M; Ihling C; Allmann KH; Laubenberger J; Tauer U; Adler CP; Langer M
Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(7):1123-9. PubMed ID: 9724423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T.
Siepmann DB; McGovern J; Brittain JH; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1510-5. PubMed ID: 18029893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy.
Bauer JS; Krause SJ; Ross CJ; Krug R; Carballido-Gamio J; Ozhinsky E; Majumdar S; Link TM
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 17057067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging.
Ba-Ssalamah A; Schibany N; Puig S; Herneth AM; Noebauer-Huhmann IM; Trattnig S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2002 Aug; 16(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 12203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. T2 Relaxation time quantitation differs between pulse sequences in articular cartilage.
Matzat SJ; McWalter EJ; Kogan F; Chen W; Gold GE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jul; 42(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 25244647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bilaminar pattern of tibial condyle cartilage layer on the fat-suppressed 3D gradient echo images: artifact or structural and biochemical difference in composition of cartilage?
Trattnig S; Mlynárik V; Jung B; Bader T; Sulzbacher I; Herneth A; Gaisch R; Puig S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Feb; 19(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11358656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Artificially produced cartilage lesions in small joints: detection with optimized MRI-sequences.
Link TM; Lindner N; Haeussler M; Reimer P; Allkemper T; Jerosch J; Peterfy C; Majumdar S; Peters PE
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(8):949-56. PubMed ID: 9322214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rapid estimation of cartilage T2 with reduced T1 sensitivity using double echo steady state imaging.
Heule R; Ganter C; Bieri O
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Mar; 71(3):1137-43. PubMed ID: 23666766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fat-suppressed 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo imaging of the cartilage with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.
Zheng ZZ; Shan H; Li X
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 May; 194(5):W414-9. PubMed ID: 20410387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic value of T1ρ and T2 mapping sequences of 3D fat-suppressed spoiled gradient (FS SPGR-3D) 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging for osteoarthritis.
Li Z; Wang H; Lu Y; Jiang M; Chen Z; Xi X; Ding X; Yan F
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(1):e13834. PubMed ID: 30608398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences.
Kornaat PR; Reeder SB; Koo S; Brittain JH; Yu H; Andriacchi TP; Gold GE
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2005 Apr; 13(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 15780647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MR imaging of hyaline cartilage at 0.5 T: a quantitative and qualitative in vitro evaluation of three types of sequences.
van der Linden E; Kroon HM; Doornbos J; Hermans J; Bloem JL
Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Jun; 27(6):297-305. PubMed ID: 9677645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Glenoid labrum: MR imaging with histologic correlation.
Loredo R; Longo C; Salonen D; Yu J; Haghighi P; Trudell D; Clopton P; Resnick D
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 7784584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Artifact-suppressed optimal three-dimensional T
Do WJ; Kim KH; Choi SH; Park SH
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Nov; 76(5):1504-1511. PubMed ID: 26536831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of equilibrium magnetization mapping in sliced two-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence with variable flip angle.
Kuribayashi H; Sekino M; Minowa T; Maitani Y; Ohsaki H; Tsushima S; Hirai S; Ueda M; Katayama Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1245-50. PubMed ID: 23390025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact.
McGibbon CA; Bencardino J; Palmer WE
MAGMA; 2003 Feb; 16(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12695880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
