These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20815462)

  • 1. Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.
    Brown CA; Scherrer NM; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1272-9. PubMed ID: 20815462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.
    Brown CA; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 19546806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shifting Fundamental Frequency in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Listening: Effects of F0 Variation.
    Brown CA; Helms Tillery K; Apoux F; Doyle NM; Bacon SP
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):e18-25. PubMed ID: 26565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing.
    Brown CA; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1658-65. PubMed ID: 19275323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones.
    Zhang C; Peng G; Wang WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1088-99. PubMed ID: 22894228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognition of temporally interrupted and spectrally degraded sentences with additional unprocessed low-frequency speech.
    Başkent D; Chatterjee M
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 20817081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech.
    Liu C; Azimi B; Tahmina Q; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temporal modulation rate on the intelligibility of phase-based speech.
    Chen F; Guan T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL520. PubMed ID: 25669298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The intelligibility of speech in a harmonic masker varying in fundamental frequency contour, broadband temporal envelope, and spatial location.
    Leclère T; Lavandier M; Deroche MLD
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():1-10. PubMed ID: 28390253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter.
    Rosen S; Hui SN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.
    Anderson S; Skoe E; Chandrasekaran B; Zecker S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):151-7. PubMed ID: 20708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness against distortion of fundamental frequency cues in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
    Vermeulen A; Verschuur C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):229. PubMed ID: 27475149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K; Araki T; Nakajima Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Kong YY; Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3717-27. PubMed ID: 17552722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multimodal and Spectral Degradation Effects on Speech and Emotion Recognition in Adult Listeners.
    Ritter C; Vongpaisal T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518804966. PubMed ID: 30378469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.
    Whitmal NA; DeMaio D; Lin R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):733-44. PubMed ID: 25698008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.