These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20815468)

  • 1. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages.
    Swerts M; Hirschberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1337-45. PubMed ID: 20815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Separability of prosodic phrase boundary and phonemic information.
    Nakai S; Turk AE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):966-76. PubMed ID: 21361453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of Parkinson's disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.
    Pell MD; Cheang HS; Leonard CL
    Brain Lang; 2006 May; 97(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 16226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22352476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On-line processing of "pop-out" words in spoken French dialogues.
    Magne C; Astésano C; Lacheret-Dujour A; Morel M; Alter K; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 May; 17(5):740-56. PubMed ID: 15904541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic studies on the processing of vocal interjections: how to disentangle lexical and prosodic information?
    Dietrich S; Ackermann H; Szameitat DP; Alter K
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():295-302. PubMed ID: 17015087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When "okay" is not okay: acoustic characteristics of single-word prosody conveying reluctance.
    van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):EL13-9. PubMed ID: 23298012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic cues to grammatical structure in infant-directed speech: cross-linguistic evidence.
    Fisher C; Tokura H
    Child Dev; 1996 Dec; 67(6):3192-218. PubMed ID: 9071777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity.
    Allbritton DW; McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):714-35. PubMed ID: 8656153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Crossmodal and incremental perception of audiovisual cues to emotional speech.
    Barkhuysen P; Krahmer E; Swerts M
    Lang Speech; 2010; 53(Pt 1):3-30. PubMed ID: 20415000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying isolated, multispeaker Mandarin tones from brief acoustic input: a perceptual and acoustic study.
    Lee CY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1125-37. PubMed ID: 19206887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: for the speaker or for the addressee?
    Kraljic T; Brennan SE
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Mar; 50(2):194-231. PubMed ID: 15680144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.
    Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Alignment to visual speech information.
    Miller RM; Sanchez K; Rosenblum LD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1614-25. PubMed ID: 20675805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Understanding the emotional expression of verbal interjections: a functional MRI study.
    Dietrich S; Hertrich I; Alter K; Ischebeck A; Ackermann H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Dec; 19(18):1751-5. PubMed ID: 18955907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Influence of human personal features on acoustic correlates of speech emotional intonation characteristics].
    Dmitrieva ES; Gel'man VIa; Zaĭtseva KA; Orlov AM
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2009; 59(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 19947529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.