BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

22 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20816144)

  • 1. Avoiding loss of native individuals in birth certificate data.
    Holloway K; Radack J; Passarella M; Ellison AM; Chaiyachati BH; Burris HH; Montoya-Williams D
    J Perinatol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):385-386. PubMed ID: 35871190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of gestational age estimate method on the calculation of preterm birth rates.
    Hall ES; Folger AT; Kelly EA; Kamath-Rayne BD
    Matern Child Health J; 2014 Apr; 18(3):755-62. PubMed ID: 23775254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rates of labor induction without medical indication are overestimated when derived from birth certificate data.
    Bailit JL;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):269.e1-3. PubMed ID: 20816150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.
    DiGiuseppe DL; Aron DC; Payne SM; Snow RJ; Dierker L; Rosenthal GE
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):959-77. PubMed ID: 11666112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Induction of labor in the absence of standard medical indications: incidence and correlates.
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Cárdenas V; Nelson JC; Holt VL; Gardella C; Easterling TR
    Med Care; 2007 Jun; 45(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 17515777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data.
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Holt VL; Cárdenas V; Nelson JC; Easterling TR; Gardella C; Callaghan WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 16021070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records.
    Zollinger TW; Przybylski MJ; Gamache RE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 16039875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trends and controversies in labor induction.
    Moleti CA
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):40-7; quiz 48-9. PubMed ID: 19104318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vital records for quality improvement.
    Gould JB
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):278-90. PubMed ID: 9917471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down?
    Kirby RS
    Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 15153136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using birth certificate data to determine medically indicated induction rates.
    Callaghan WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):190-1. PubMed ID: 20816144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.