641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20816303)
1. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of frictional forces in active and passive self-ligating brackets with various archwire alloys.
Krishnan M; Kalathil S; Abraham KM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):675-82. PubMed ID: 19892284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of the frictional forces between brackets and archwire with three passive self-ligating brackets.
Cordasco G; Farronato G; Festa F; Nucera R; Parazzoli E; Grossi GB
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):643-6. PubMed ID: 19797412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrastructural effect of self-ligating bracket materials on stainless steel and superelastic NiTi wire surfaces.
Choi S; Lee S; Cheong Y; Park KH; Park HK; Park YG
Microsc Res Tech; 2012 Aug; 75(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 22419658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forces released during sliding mechanics with passive self-ligating brackets or nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.
Franchi L; Baccetti T; Camporesi M; Barbato E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 18174077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sliding resistance of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets and stainless steel esthetic archwires.
Hiroce M; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN; Miguel JA
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 23021118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of frictional forces of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets.
Fernandes DJ; Miguel JA; Quintão CC; Elias CN
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 20877734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
Rajakulendran J; Jones S
Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frictional properties of aesthetic brackets.
Reicheneder CA; Baumert U; Gedrange T; Proff P; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 17702795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
Henao SP; Kusy RP
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of frictional resistance between self-ligating and conventional brackets tied with elastomeric and metal ligature in orthodontic archwires.
Leite VV; Lopes MB; Gonini Júnior A; Almeida MR; Moura SK; Almeida RR
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 25162575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
