101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20816598)
1. Prevalence of renal artery stenosis in flash pulmonary oedema: determination using gadolinium-enhanced MRA.
McMahon CJ; Hennessy M; Boyle G; Feely J; Meaney JF
Eur J Intern Med; 2010 Oct; 21(5):424-8. PubMed ID: 20816598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA.
Maki JH; Wilson GJ; Eubank WB; Glickerman DJ; Pipavath S; Hoogeveen RM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):966-73. PubMed ID: 17896351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technology insight: Clinical role of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis and management of renal artery stenosis.
Dellegrottaglie S; Sanz J; Rajagopalan S
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2006 Jun; 3(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 16729011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unenhanced respiratory-gated magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of renal artery in hypertensive patients using true fast imaging with steady-state precession technique compared with contrast-enhanced MRA.
Zhang W; Lin J; Wang S; Lv P; Wang L; Liu H; Chen C; Zeng M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):700-4. PubMed ID: 24733000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.
Glockner JF; Takahashi N; Kawashima A; Woodrum DA; Stanley DW; Takei N; Miyoshi M; Sun W
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 20512894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct comparison of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) accelerated and conventional 3D contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of renal arteries: effect of increasing spatial resolution.
Muthupillai R; Douglas E; Huber S; Lambert B; Pereyra M; Wilson GJ; Flamm SD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 20027583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Renal artery stenosis by three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in type 2 diabetics with uncontrolled hypertension and chronic renal insufficiency: prevalence and effect on renal function.
Myers DI; Poole LJ; Imam K; Scheel PJ; Eustace JA
Am J Kidney Dis; 2003 Feb; 41(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 12552496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of undiagnosed renal artery stenosis among Japanese patients with risk factors of atherosclerosis.
Tanemoto M; Saitoh H; Satoh F; Satoh H; Abe T; Ito S
Hypertens Res; 2005 Mar; 28(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 16097367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Usefulness of magnetic resonance angiography in the screening of renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients: proposition of a diagnostic algorithm: a study of 245 patients].
Biausque F; Willoteaux S; Beregi JP; Devos P; Deklunder G; Mounier-Vehier C
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2006; 99(7-8):705-11. PubMed ID: 17061449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography utilizing parallel acquisition techniques in renal artery stenosis detection.
Slanina M; Zizka J; Klzo L; Lojík M
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19671492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries].
Matos C; Metens T; Nicaise N; Golzarian J; Dussaussois L; Struyven J
Rev Med Brux; 1999 Sep; 20(4):A348-51. PubMed ID: 10523920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 tesla.
Wilson GJ; Maki JH
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2009 Feb; 17(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 19364597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy and safety of gadodiamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA) in renal 3D-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA): a phase II study.
Kittner T; Rudolf J; Fages JF; Legmann P; Aschauer M; Repa I; Alvares MR; Savalegui I; Ittrich H; Geterud K; de Kevviler E; Ayuso J; Lockhart ME; Blum A; Iliasch H; Leisinger G; van Beek EJ; Reid AW; Brown JJ; Yu TC; Flamm SD; Düber C; Judmaier W; Reimer P; Stiskal M; Kramann B; Wolff S; Blankenstein C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):456-64. PubMed ID: 17412546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Epidemiology, associated factors, and prognostic outcomes of renal artery stenosis in chronic heart failure assessed by magnetic resonance angiography.
de Silva R; Loh H; Rigby AS; Nikitin NP; Witte KK; Goode K; Bhandari S; Nicholson A; Clark AL; Cleland JG
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Jul; 100(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 17631082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The profile of cardiac patients with renal artery stenosis.
Buller CE; Nogareda JG; Ramanathan K; Ricci DR; Djurdjev O; Tinckam KJ; Penn IM; Fox RS; Stevens LA; Duncan JA; Levin A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 May; 43(9):1606-13. PubMed ID: 15120819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prevalence of renal artery stenosis among patients with diabetes mellitus.
Postma CT; Klappe EM; Dekker HM; Thien T
Eur J Intern Med; 2012 Oct; 23(7):639-42. PubMed ID: 22939809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of source images is necessary for the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for renal artery stenosis.
Wehrschuetz M; Aschauer M; Portugaller H; Stix A; Wehrschuetz-Sigl E; Hausegger K; Ebner F
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2004; 27(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 15383846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
