These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20817078)

  • 1. Skin sensory information from the dorsum of the foot and ankle is necessary for kinesthesia at the ankle joint.
    Lowrey CR; Strzalkowski ND; Bent LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 20817078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vibrotactile stimulation of fast-adapting cutaneous afferents from the foot modulates proprioception at the ankle joint.
    Mildren RL; Bent LR
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Apr; 120(8):855-64. PubMed ID: 26823342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cutaneous afferent feedback from the posterior ankle contributes to proprioception.
    Mildren RL; Hare CM; Bent LR
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 636():145-150. PubMed ID: 27984196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of ankle joint movement on knee joint kinesthesia at various movement velocities.
    Brindle TJ; Lebiedowska MK; Miller JL; Stanhope SJ
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Apr; 20(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 19486484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proprioception of foot and ankle complex in young regular practitioners of ice hockey, ballet dancing and running.
    Li JX; Xu DQ; Hoshizaki B
    Res Sports Med; 2009; 17(4):205-16. PubMed ID: 19967600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving human ankle joint position sense using an artificial tongue-placed tactile biofeedback.
    Vuillerme N; Chenu O; Demongeot J; Payan Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Sep; 405(1-2):19-23. PubMed ID: 16876318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do joint receptors modulate the motoneuron excitability?
    Sabbahi MA; Fox AM; Druffle C
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Nov; 30(7):387-96. PubMed ID: 2261883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetry of the active nonweightbearing foot and ankle range of motion for dorsiflexion-plantar flexion and its coupled movements in adults.
    Ferrario VF; Turci M; Lovecchio N; Shirai YF; Sforza C
    Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):834-42. PubMed ID: 17584864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test-retest reliability of a new device for assessing ankle joint threshold to detect passive movement in healthy adults.
    Sun W; Song Q; Yu B; Zhang C; Mao D
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(16):1667-74. PubMed ID: 25712530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Right to left differences in the ankle joint complex range of motion.
    Stefanyshyn DJ; Engsberg JR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 8007801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where was my arm again? Memory-based matching of proprioceptive targets is enhanced by increased target presentation time.
    Goble DJ; Noble BC; Brown SH
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Aug; 481(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 20600603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of an automated device to measure sagittal plane stiffness of an articulated ankle-foot orthosis.
    Kobayashi T; Leung AK; Akazawa Y; Naito H; Tanaka M; Hutchins SW
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Dec; 34(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 20681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
    J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of upper motoneuron plantarflexion contractures by using an adjustable ankle-foot orthosis.
    Grissom SP; Blanton S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Feb; 82(2):270-3. PubMed ID: 11239325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measures of accuracy for active shoulder movements at 3 different speeds with kinesthetic and visual feedback.
    Brindle TJ; Nitz AJ; Uhl TL; Kifer E; Shapiro R
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Aug; 34(8):468-78. PubMed ID: 15373010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee.
    Collins DF; Refshauge KM; Todd G; Gandevia SC
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 94(3):1699-706. PubMed ID: 15917323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.
    Howe EE; Toth AJ; Bent LR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):2887-2898. PubMed ID: 30073386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depth of ankle inversion and discrimination of foot positions.
    Symes M; Waddington G; Adams R
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Oct; 111(2):475-84. PubMed ID: 21162449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of 20 days horizontal bed rest on kinesthesia during knee flexion and two-point discrimination in skin of young subjects.
    Okamoto Y; Sekiya N; Miyashita S; Asada H; Yano Y; Morishima K; Yamamoto T; Goto S; Suzuki Y; Gunji A
    J Gravit Physiol; 1997 Jan; 4(1):S91-4. PubMed ID: 11541184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception.
    Feuerbach JW; Grabiner MD; Koh TJ; Weiker GG
    Am J Sports Med; 1994; 22(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 8198191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.