153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20817887)
1. Experimental design and statistical methods for improved hit detection in high-throughput screening.
Malo N; Hanley JA; Carlile G; Liu J; Pelletier J; Thomas D; Nadon R
J Biomol Screen; 2010 Sep; 15(8):990-1000. PubMed ID: 20817887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying actives from HTS data sets: practical approaches for the selection of an appropriate HTS data-processing method and quality control review.
Shun TY; Lazo JS; Sharlow ER; Johnston PA
J Biomol Screen; 2011 Jan; 16(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 21160066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of hit detection and confirmation in single and duplicate high-throughput screenings.
Wu Z; Liu D; Sui Y
J Biomol Screen; 2008 Feb; 13(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 18216390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the prediction of statistical parameters in high-throughput screening using resampling techniques.
Ilouga PE; Hesterkamp T
J Biomol Screen; 2012 Jul; 17(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 22460175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Latent hit series hidden in high-throughput screening data.
Varin T; Didiot MC; Parker CN; Schuffenhauer A
J Med Chem; 2012 Feb; 55(3):1161-70. PubMed ID: 22185196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using clustering techniques to improve hit selection in high-throughput screening.
Gagarin A; Makarenkov V; Zentilli P
J Biomol Screen; 2006 Dec; 11(8):903-14. PubMed ID: 17092911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new method with flexible and balanced control of false negatives and false positives for hit selection in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays.
Zhang XD
J Biomol Screen; 2007 Aug; 12(5):645-55. PubMed ID: 17517904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel statistical approach for primary high-throughput screening hit selection.
Yan SF; Asatryan H; Li J; Zhou Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(6):1784-90. PubMed ID: 16309285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical practice in high-throughput screening data analysis.
Malo N; Hanley JA; Cerquozzi S; Pelletier J; Nadon R
Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 16465162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robust statistical methods for hit selection in RNA interference high-throughput screening experiments.
Zhang XD; Yang XC; Chung N; Gates A; Stec E; Kunapuli P; Holder DJ; Ferrer M; Espeseth AS
Pharmacogenomics; 2006 Apr; 7(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 16610941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Median absolute deviation to improve hit selection for genome-scale RNAi screens.
Chung N; Zhang XD; Kreamer A; Locco L; Kuan PF; Bartz S; Linsley PS; Ferrer M; Strulovici B
J Biomol Screen; 2008 Feb; 13(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 18216396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
Mayr LM; Bojanic D
Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved statistical methods for hit selection in high-throughput screening.
Brideau C; Gunter B; Pikounis B; Liaw A
J Biomol Screen; 2003 Dec; 8(6):634-47. PubMed ID: 14711389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery.
McInnes C
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2007 Oct; 11(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 17936059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hypothesis-driven screening.
Schopfer U; Engeloch C; Höhn F; Mees H; Leeds J; Glickman F; Scheel G; Ferrand S; Fekkes P; Pfeifer M
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 575():297-316. PubMed ID: 19727621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Probing the primary screening efficiency by multiple replicate testing: a quantitative analysis of hit confirmation and false screening results of a biochemical assay.
Zhang JH; Wu X; Sills MA
J Biomol Screen; 2005 Oct; 10(7):695-704. PubMed ID: 16129776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for identifying compounds that specifically target translation.
Brandi L; Fabbretti A; Milon P; Carotti M; Pon CL; Gualerzi CO
Methods Enzymol; 2007; 431():229-67. PubMed ID: 17923238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An efficient method for the detection and elimination of systematic error in high-throughput screening.
Makarenkov V; Zentilli P; Kevorkov D; Gagarin A; Malo N; Nadon R
Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1648-57. PubMed ID: 17463024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case studies of minimizing nonspecific inhibitors in HTS campaigns that use assay-ready plates.
Liu Y; Beresini MH; Johnson A; Mintzer R; Shah K; Clark K; Schmidt S; Lewis C; Liimatta M; Elliott LO; Gustafson A; Heise CE
J Biomol Screen; 2012 Feb; 17(2):225-36. PubMed ID: 21940710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Error rates and powers in genome-scale RNAi screens.
Zhang XD; Marine SD; Ferrer M
J Biomol Screen; 2009 Mar; 14(3):230-8. PubMed ID: 19211781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
