These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20817912)

  • 1. Overheard cell-phone conversations: when less speech is more distracting.
    Emberson LL; Lupyan G; Goldstein MH; Spivey MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1383-8. PubMed ID: 20817912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Driving performance while using cell phones: an observational study.
    Rosenbloom T
    J Safety Res; 2006; 37(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 16690086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Engrossed in conversation: the impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance.
    Beede KE; Kass SJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Mar; 38(2):415-21. PubMed ID: 16310750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shifting attention across near and far spaces: implications for the use of hands-free cell phones while driving.
    Ferlazzo F; Fagioli S; Di Nocera F; Sdoia S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Nov; 40(6):1859-64. PubMed ID: 19068287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why are background telephone conversations distracting?
    Marsh JE; Ljung R; Jahncke H; MacCutcheon D; Pausch F; Ball LJ; Vachon F
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Jun; 24(2):222-235. PubMed ID: 29878842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differing types of cellular phone conversations and dangerous driving.
    Dula CS; Martin BA; Fox RT; Leonard RL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jan; 43(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 21094312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of cell phone conversations on the attention and memory of bystanders.
    Galván VV; Vessal RS; Golley MT
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58579. PubMed ID: 23516514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving.
    Shinar D; Tractinsky N; Compton R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 15667818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chatting in the face of the eyewitness: The impact of extraneous cell-phone conversation on memory for a perpetrator.
    Marsh JE; Patel K; Labonté K; Threadgold E; Skelton FC; Fodarella C; Thorley R; Battersby KL; Frowd CD; Ball LJ; Vachon F
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):183-190. PubMed ID: 28604030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell phone use and visual attention.
    Golden C; Golden CJ; Schneider B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):385-9. PubMed ID: 14620222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual field attention is reduced by concomitant hands-free conversation on a cellular telephone.
    Barkana Y; Zadok D; Morad Y; Avni I
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 15364215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive pitfall! Videogame players are not immune to dual-task costs.
    Donohue SE; James B; Eslick AN; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 22669792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance.
    Rakauskas ME; Gugerty LJ; Ward NJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 15474548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving while conversing: cell phones that distract and passengers who react.
    Charlton SG
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 Jan; 41(1):160-73. PubMed ID: 19114151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cellular telephones and driving performance: the effects of attentional demands on motor vehicle crash risk.
    Hunton J; Rose JM
    Risk Anal; 2005 Aug; 25(4):855-66. PubMed ID: 16268934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of intelligibility on working memory demand for speech perception.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1360-74. PubMed ID: 19633351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of auditory distraction on cognitive processing of young adults.
    LaPointe LL; Heald GR; Stierwalt JA; Kemker BE; Maurice T
    J Atten Disord; 2007 May; 10(4):398-409. PubMed ID: 17449839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
    Gherri E; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.