BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081823)

  • 1. Monovision.
    Josephson JE; Erickson P; Back A; Holden BA; Harris M; Tomlinson A; Caffrey BE; Finnemore V; Silbert J
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1990 Nov; 61(11):820-6. PubMed ID: 2081823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of single binocular vision.
    McGill EC; Erickson P
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 Nov; 62(11):828-31. PubMed ID: 1813510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An exploration of modified monovision with diffractive bifocal contact lenses.
    Freeman MH; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Jul; 30(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 17289423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation to multifocal and monovision contact lens correction.
    Fernandes PR; Neves HI; Lopes-Ferreira DP; Jorge JM; González-Meijome JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 90(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 23376896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular dominance in monovision patient success.
    Erickson P; McGill EC
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Oct; 69(10):761-4. PubMed ID: 1436996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.
    Harris JM; Wilcox LM
    Vision Res; 2009 Nov; 49(22):2666-85. PubMed ID: 19577589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
    Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual outcomes of LASIK-induced monovision in myopic patients with presbyopia.
    Xiao J; Jiang C; Zhang M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 151(3):557; author reply 557-8. PubMed ID: 21335110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gait alterations negotiating a raised surface induced by monocular blur.
    Vale A; Buckley JG; Elliott DB
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Dec; 85(12):1128-34. PubMed ID: 19050467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laser in situ keratomileusis-induced monovision.
    Carifi G; Zuberbuhler B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 151(2):385-6; author reply 386. PubMed ID: 21251502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method to analyse the effect of multifocal contact lenses on visual function.
    Sanchez I; Ortiz-Toquero S; Blanco M; Martin R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Apr; 41(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 29217455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presbyopia compensation: looking for cortical predictors.
    Imbeau L; Majzoub S; Thillay A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Pisella PJ; Batty M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 101(2):223-226. PubMed ID: 27107029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monovision: a review.
    Evans BJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):417-39. PubMed ID: 17718882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of ocular dominance on binocular summation after monocular reading adds.
    Handa T; Shimizu K; Mukuno K; Kawamorita T; Uozato H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1588-92. PubMed ID: 16129296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis.
    Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ
    Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive gait changes in long-term wearers of contact lens monovision correction.
    Chapman GJ; Vale A; Buckley J; Scally AJ; Elliott DB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 May; 30(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 20444135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.
    Gheorghiu E; Erkelens CJ
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(12):1603-14. PubMed ID: 15781076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
    Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.