These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20819139)

  • 1. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Abi Nader S; de Souza RF; Fortin D; De Koninck L; Fromentin O; Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20819139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear of ceramic and titanium ball attachments in subjects with an implant-retained overdenture: a controlled clinical trial.
    Büttel AE; Lüthy H; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22304745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of interimplant divergence on the retention characteristics of locator attachments, a laboratory study.
    Stephens GJ; di Vitale N; O'Sullivan E; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 24750293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The retentive forces of the locator attachment system at different angulations.
    Stergiou A; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 23495558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Berberi A; Majzoub Z; Bassal H; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28913855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.