95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081946)
1. Effectiveness of a brush in removing postinstrumentation canal debris.
Keir DM; Senia ES; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1990 Jul; 16(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 2081946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
Walker TL; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
Campos JM; del Rio C
J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
Walker TL; del Rio CE
J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
Hülsmann M; Stryga F
J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
Tan BT; Messer HH
J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars.
Ibarrola JL; Knowles KI; Ludlow MO; McKinley IB
J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):236-8. PubMed ID: 9594773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo.
Yoshioka T; Kikuchi I; Fukumoto Y; Kobayashi C; Suda H
Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 15667634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remaining dentin/cementum thickness after hand or ultrasonic instrumentation.
McCann JT; Keller DL; LaBounty GL
J Endod; 1990 Mar; 16(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 2388025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
Cheung GS; Chan AW
J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
Shah N
Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of endodontic access in locating maxillary and mandibular molar canals.
Christie WH; Thompson GK
J Can Dent Assoc; 1994 Jun; 60(6):527-32, 535-6. PubMed ID: 8032994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
