These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081946)

  • 1. Effectiveness of a brush in removing postinstrumentation canal debris.
    Keir DM; Senia ES; Montgomery S
    J Endod; 1990 Jul; 16(7):323-7. PubMed ID: 2081946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentation of curved root canals.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1989 Feb; 15(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2607269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals.
    Campos JM; del Rio C
    J Endod; 1990 May; 16(5):230-4. PubMed ID: 2074418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Histological evaluation of ultrasonic debridement comparing sodium hypochlorite and water.
    Walker TL; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1991 Feb; 17(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 1919404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of root canal preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation.
    Hülsmann M; Stryga F
    J Endod; 1993 Mar; 19(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 8509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars.
    Ibarrola JL; Knowles KI; Ludlow MO; McKinley IB
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):236-8. PubMed ID: 9594773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo.
    Yoshioka T; Kikuchi I; Fukumoto Y; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 15667634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Remaining dentin/cementum thickness after hand or ultrasonic instrumentation.
    McCann JT; Keller DL; LaBounty GL
    J Endod; 1990 Mar; 16(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 2388025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment.
    Nair PN; Henry S; Cano V; Vera J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Feb; 99(2):231-52. PubMed ID: 15660098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Vlassis M
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of cutting efficiency of hand, gyromatic and path-finder root canal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study.
    Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8180277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of volume, type of irrigant and flushing method on removing artificially placed dentine debris from the apical root canal during passive ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Gambarini G; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jun; 39(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 16674742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of endodontic access in locating maxillary and mandibular molar canals.
    Christie WH; Thompson GK
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1994 Jun; 60(6):527-32, 535-6. PubMed ID: 8032994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.