These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2081946)

  • 21. Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the modified double-flared technique.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    J Endod; 1994 Sep; 20(9):440-4. PubMed ID: 7996114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population--a clinical study.
    Pattanshetti N; Gaidhane M; Al Kandari AM
    Int Endod J; 2008 Sep; 41(9):755-62. PubMed ID: 18637850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
    Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
    J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Determination of the minimum instrumentation size for penetration of irrigants to the apical third of root canal systems.
    Khademi A; Yazdizadeh M; Feizianfard M
    J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):417-20. PubMed ID: 16631839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of Flex-R files and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals.
    Sepic AO; Pantera EA; Neaverth EJ; Anderson RW
    J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):240-5. PubMed ID: 2592877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of a new brush-covered irrigation needle in removing root canal debris: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Al-Hadlaq SM; Al-Turaiki SA; Al-Sulami U; Saad AY
    J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1181-4. PubMed ID: 17174678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Canal preparation of fluorotic teeth].
    Belkhir MS; Benani S; Ben Ghenaia H; Bhouri L
    Rev Fr Endod; 1990 Dec; 9(4):17-33. PubMed ID: 2077576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second permanent molar teeth in a Ugandan population.
    Rwenyonyi CM; Kutesa AM; Muwazi LM; Buwembo W
    Int Endod J; 2007 Sep; 40(9):679-83. PubMed ID: 17608678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of curved canal transportation with balanced force versus lightspeed.
    Shadid DB; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1998 Oct; 24(10):651-4. PubMed ID: 10023246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques.
    Ruiz-Hubard EE; Gutmann JL; Wagner MJ
    J Endod; 1987 Dec; 13(12):554-8. PubMed ID: 3482231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The evaluation of the ability of Apex D.S.P. to determine the length of root canal. In vitro study].
    Lewińska E; Lipski M; Marciniak-Paradowska M; Woźniak K; Lichota D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 19374229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals.
    Nielsen BA; Craig Baumgartner J
    J Endod; 2007 May; 33(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 17437884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar.
    Eskoz N; Weine FS
    J Endod; 1995 Jan; 21(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 7714433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quantification of mechanical versus ultrasonic technique in root canal preparation].
    Teodorović N; Ivanović V; Filipović V
    Stomatol Glas Srb; 1990 Jun; 37(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 2131673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [In vitro comparison of root canal preparation with step-back technique and GT rotary file--a nickel-titanium engine driven rotary instrument system].
    Krajczár K; Tóth V; Nyárády Z; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2005 Jun; 98(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 16108416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The effect of coronal preflaring on the working length measurement of root canals in molars].
    Wang Q; Xiong SJ; Dou HQ; Zhou RE
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2004 Jun; 13(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 15269853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.