199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20820178)
81. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity.
Kalsi-Ryan S; Beaton D; Curt A; Duff S; Popovic MR; Rudhe C; Fehlings MG; Verrier MC
J Neurotrauma; 2012 Mar; 29(5):905-14. PubMed ID: 21568688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Validation of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index for community-dwelling persons with chronic spinal cord injury.
Hitzig SL; Romero Escobar EM; Noreau L; Craven BC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Jan; 93(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 22200389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Metric properties of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure - Self Report in a community survey.
Prodinger B; Ballert CS; Brinkhof MW; Tennant A; Post MW
J Rehabil Med; 2016 Feb; 48(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 26926919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. A Rasch-Based Comparison of the Functional Independence Measure and Spinal Cord Independence Measure for Outcome and Quality in the Rehabilitation of Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.
Maritz R; Fellinghauer C; Brach M; Curt A; Gmünder HP; Hopfe M; Hund-Georgiadis M; Jordan X; Scheel-Sailer A; Stucki G
J Rehabil Med; 2022 Feb; 54():jrm00262. PubMed ID: 35166364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Neoplastic myelopathies and traumatic spinal cord lesions: an Italian comparison of functional and neurological outcomes.
Scivoletto G; Lapenna LM; Di Donna V; Laurenza L; Sterzi S; Foti C; Molinari M
Spinal Cord; 2011 Jul; 49(7):799-805. PubMed ID: 21321577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation.
Greenwald BD; Seel RT; Cifu DX; Shah AN
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Sep; 82(9):1181-7. PubMed ID: 11552188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Paraplegia after aortic aneurysm repair versus traumatic spinal cord injury: functional outcome, complications, and therapy intensity of inpatient rehabilitation.
Yokoyama O; Sakuma F; Itoh R; Sashika H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 87(9):1189-94. PubMed ID: 16935053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. Assessment of unsupported sitting in patients with spinal cord injury.
Jørgensen V; Elfving B; Opheim A
Spinal Cord; 2011 Jul; 49(7):838-43. PubMed ID: 21358720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Comparing rehabilitation services and outcomes between older and younger people with spinal cord injury.
Hsieh CH; DeJong G; Groah S; Ballard PH; Horn SD; Tian W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Apr; 94(4 Suppl):S175-86. PubMed ID: 23527773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. Proposal and validation of a clinical trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Quinzaños J; Villa AR; Flores AA; Pérez R
Spinal Cord; 2014 Jun; 52(6):449-54. PubMed ID: 24710149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Functional independence and rehabilitation outcome in traumatic spinal cord injury.
Jongjit J; Sutharom W; Komsopapong L; Numpechitra N; Songjakkaew P
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2004 Dec; 35(4):980-5. PubMed ID: 15916102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. Interrater reliability of functional status scores for patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
Kohler F; Redmond H; Dickson H; Connolly C; Estell J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1031-7. PubMed ID: 20599041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Effects of etiology on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in 65- to 74-year-old patients with incomplete paraplegia from a nontraumatic spinal cord injury.
Kay E; Deutsch A; Chen D; Manheim L; Rowles D
PM R; 2010 Jun; 2(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 20630437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. A prediction model of functional outcome at 6 months using clinical findings of a person with traumatic spinal cord injury at 1 month after injury.
Ariji Y; Hayashi T; Ideta R; Koga R; Murai S; Towatari F; Terashi Y; Sakai H; Kurata H; Maeda T
Spinal Cord; 2020 Nov; 58(11):1158-1165. PubMed ID: 32444638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III.
Cho DY; Shin HI; Kim HR; Lee BS; Kim GR; Leigh JH; Lee KJ; Han ZA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Apr; 99(4):305-309. PubMed ID: 31651451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Association Between SCIM III Total Scores and Individual Item Scores to Predict Independence With ADLs in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.
Unai K; Uemura O; Takemura R; Kawakami M; Liu M
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl; 2019 Dec; 1(3-4):100029. PubMed ID: 33543058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Relationships between disability measures and nursing effort during medical rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain and spinal cord injury.
Heinemann AW; Kirk P; Hastie BA; Semik P; Hamilton BB; Linacre JM; Wright BD; Granger C
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Feb; 78(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 9041894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Reference Values and Cutoff Scores of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III to Determine Independence for Wheelchair Users and Ambulatory Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.
Amatachaya S; Khamnon N; Wattanapan P; Wiyanad A; Thaweewannakij T; Namwong W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Jan; 104(1):83-89. PubMed ID: 36228763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Sound psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report.
Jörgensen S; Butler Forslund E; Lundström U; Nilsson E; Levi R; Berndtsson E; Divanoglou A
J Rehabil Med; 2021 May; 53(5):jrm00197. PubMed ID: 33948671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
