These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20820967)

  • 1. Overlap of radiation field and radiation field shape in cardiac catheterization.
    Nakajima T; Take T; Sumi S; Ishida H; Nakazawa Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2011 Jan; 4(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 20820967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Efficacy of patient skin dose reduction by a compensating filter through of irradiation field overlaps on the area during percutaneous coronary intervention].
    Yamasaki H; Nakahara M; Yamaguchi S; Yamamoto N; Miyagawa T; Hirose E; Takenaka T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1565-73. PubMed ID: 22186202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Morishima Y; Inaba Y; Taura M; Ebata A; Takeda K; Shimura H; Zuguchi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22117021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of MOSFET Dosimeter Angular Response Using a Spherical Phantom for Fluoroscopic Dosimetry.
    Wang C; Hill K; Yoshizumi T
    Health Phys; 2016 Jan; 110(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 26606064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time, ray casting-based scatter dose estimation for c-arm x-ray system.
    Alnewaini Z; Langer E; Schaber P; David M; Kretz D; Steil V; Hesser J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 28300387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Personal operator dose in invasive cardiology as a function of body height and tube angulation].
    Kuon E; Empen K; Reuter G; Dahm JB
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):739-45. PubMed ID: 15122474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dose evaluation of a flat-panel detector system].
    Seguchi S; Ishikawa Y; Mizuno S; Saijou T; Nagao T; Nakamura A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Nov; 59(11):1438-43. PubMed ID: 14983132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures: conventional fluoroscopy versus pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Chida K; Fuda K; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):115-21; discussion 122. PubMed ID: 17139653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability in radiation dose and image quality: A comparison across fluoroscopy-system vendors, generations of equipment and institutions.
    Hill KD; Mann SD; Carboni MP; Doyle TP; Idriss SF; Janssen DF; Nicholson GT; Sathanandam S; Fleming GA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):E471-E477. PubMed ID: 30208245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Empen K; Robinson DM; Reuter G; Wucherer M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 15464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering.
    den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Hummel WA; Keane D; Roelandt JR
    Circulation; 1994 Jun; 89(6):2710-4. PubMed ID: 8205685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A safety radiation marker in the cardiac catheterization lab.
    Kostakou PM; Damaskos DS; Dagre AG; Makavos GA; Olympios CD
    Acta Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 71(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 27090035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector.
    Chida K; Inaba Y; Saito H; Ishibashi T; Takahashi S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1680-5. PubMed ID: 19933664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Gray JE; Vetter RJ; Fellows JL; Julsrud PR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 15(1):159-62. PubMed ID: 2295727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of exposure dose to patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures--a phantom study.
    Seguchi S; Aoyama T; Koyama S; Kawaura C; Fujii K
    Eur Radiol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2559-67. PubMed ID: 18491105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation exposure to children during coil occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus.
    Moore JD; Shim D; Sweet J; Arheart KL; Beekman RH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Aug; 47(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 10470475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of predicted orthogonal projection angles for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Steinvil A; Weissman G; Ertel AW; Weigold G; Rogers T; Koifman E; Buchanan KD; Shults C; Torguson R; Okubagzi PG; Satler LF; Ben-Dor I; Waksman R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 30064937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.