These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20821141)

  • 1. Radial-searching contour extraction method based on a modified active contour model for mammographic masses.
    Nakagawa T; Hara T; Fujita H; Horita K; Iwase T; Endo T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 20821141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography segmentation with maximum likelihood active contours.
    Rahmati P; Adler A; Hamarneh G
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Aug; 16(6):1167-86. PubMed ID: 22831774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of an automated method for detecting mammographic masses with a partial loss of region.
    Hatanaka Y; Hara T; Fujita H; Kasai S; Endo T; Iwase T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1209-14. PubMed ID: 11811821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hybrid segmentation of mass in mammograms using template matching and dynamic programming.
    Song E; Xu S; Xu X; Zeng J; Lan Y; Zhang S; Hung CC
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1414-24. PubMed ID: 20817575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of using manual or automatic breast density information in a mass detection CAD system.
    Oliver A; Lladó X; Freixenet J; Martí R; Pérez E; Pont J; Zwiggelaar R
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 20540910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An ellipse-fitting based method for efficient registration of breast masses on two mammographic views.
    Pu J; Zheng B; Leader JK; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 18383669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of tolerant features for characterization of masses in mammograms.
    Rojas-Domínguez A; Nandi AK
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Aug; 39(8):678-88. PubMed ID: 19524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
    Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided diagnosis of masses with full-field digital mammography.
    Li L; Clark RA; Thomas JA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jan; 9(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 11918357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
    Ke L; He W; Kang Y
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
    Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms based on the shortest path with endpoints learnt by SVMs.
    Domingues I; Cardoso JS; Amaral I; Moreira I; Passarinho P; Santa Comba J; Correia R; Cardoso MJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3158-61. PubMed ID: 21096595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection; the effect of training databases on detection of subtle breast masses.
    Zheng B; Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1401-8. PubMed ID: 20650667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
    Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiomics based detection and characterization of suspicious lesions on full field digital mammograms.
    Sapate SG; Mahajan A; Talbar SN; Sable N; Desai S; Thakur M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Sep; 163():1-20. PubMed ID: 30119844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast mass contour segmentation algorithm in digital mammograms.
    Berber T; Alpkocak A; Balci P; Dicle O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):150-9. PubMed ID: 23273502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
    Singh S; Bovis K
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.